YoungGun said:
Right back at you, YoungGun.
It was posted in the mp pistol forum by someone from the dept. I was shocked when he said it failed miserably and asked why in a follow-up post. He said it was because they didn't feed ANY of their service ammo reliably.
Here is the link.
http://mp-pistol.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=14125&hl=beretta
Original post:
My response:
Response:
I was reading through this post and then I read a reply by Disaster that said
Quote:
Except that it is a pistol with no LEO contracts and that recently miserably failed the LA Sheriffs tests.
.As far as I know I could not find any info about the LA Sheriffs debt disliking nor testing the PX4 Storm. My point to this is if someone is going post something about a product please make sure you can provide the facts. This forum like many others is for useful information NOT false statements!
Right back at you, YoungGun.
It was posted in the mp pistol forum by someone from the dept. I was shocked when he said it failed miserably and asked why in a follow-up post. He said it was because they didn't feed ANY of their service ammo reliably.
Here is the link.
http://mp-pistol.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=14125&hl=beretta
Original post:
After the approval of the HK P2000 and now the SIG's, and after the dismal performance of the Beretta PX4, I think the department will jump on the chance to allow a pistol that is easily adaptable to different hand sizes.
My response:
Curious. What issues did they have with the PX4?
Response:
It wouldn't run any of our ammo reliably, practice ammo or duty ammo.