To me, the word is too often used in conjunction with the theory that fancy gear confers skill upon a person. I've seen too many people with high-speed, low-drag** black gear who can't hit doodly. And beyond that, so much of the "tactical" stuff is just silly or counterproductive.
I was at a gun shop this weekend and asked the clerk about slings for my tanker M1. I supposed that there might be something handier for toting it around than basic African-style with a carry strap. He pulled out a super-slick tactical sling. We fitted it on to try out, and what do I find but a plastic buckle in my cheek weld. Thanks, but no thanks. I'll stick with my old Enfield sling.
Before getting the M1, I was looking at tactical vests. Every last one I looked at had at the very least thick shoulder straps. Many also had buckles, clips, and other various obstructions on the shoulders. How the heck can you get a good snug hold on a rifle with all that junk in the way? Why don't ank of them use extra-wide, extra-thin shoulder straps devoid of doohickies? Then you caould at least keep the rifle butt in the right place.
Lessee, what else?
AR15s with 11.5" barrels and 4.5" unrifled, permanently attached barrel extensions.
Heavy-profile barrels on "CQB" carbines.
Muzzle brakes on .223 AKs (tried one with a bare muzzle; it had no muzzle climb and virtually no recoil to begin with)
*Grumble...*
It's not just a gun industry thing. I went into REI the other day, and found the same thing. Stuff like $45 "deluxe backpacking pillows" (which compressed into nothing, rendering it useless), $100 walking poles (find a stick; they're free), and other such rediculus stuff. Do people actually buy it?
I've actually started taking it the other way - prefering old "obsolete" gear just to prove that it works fine. My backpacking pack is a 35+ year old canvas deal with an aluminum external frame - and I wouldn't have it any other way. Heck, it fits me better than any modern internal frame I've ever tried on. The pistols I carry from time to time were made in 1921 and 1964.
I'm not anti-technology or anti-progress (my latest acquisition is a great modern autoloading shotgun), but I'll admit that I would love to eventually be
an old fart with a Krag.
** Is it just me, or does "high-speed, low-drag" appear to really mean "pile on so much crap you can barely move"?