Will someone please help me with the scout rifle concept?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mastiffhound

Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2011
Messages
420
I've been looking at a Ruger GSR and have a few scout concept questions.

1. Scout rifles are supposed to be lightweight right?

2. Scout rifles usually have shorter and lighter(weight/profile) barrels right"

3. Swing weight for ease of rapid targeting is a must in the scout concept I thought? I tried the scout setup on an AR which was very light (7 pounds) and although it was a very light 2.5 power scout scope (it needed to be mounted to the quad rail) it made it slower to transition from one target to the next by putting extra weight towards the end of the barrel. When I went back to the 2.5-10x32 mounted on the upper receiver my time from target to target improved. The 2.5-10 is a heavier scope but it took the weight and put it more to the rear.

I'm not bashing the scout concept by any means, I'm just trying to understand it. I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or just that the scout concept may not be for me. I'm really wanting the GSR but if I can't figure out how to make the scout setup work for me then it wouldn't make sense being that I already have a .308 Savage.

Does anyone have any helpful hints or tricks? As always thanks for the help guys!
 
Plenty of past discussions about this here. Did you bother to read them?
 
I'm not even sure what you're asking. You get the concept -- sorta -- but don't get how it works for you and want a particular gun but can't justify it!?

What is this really about -- the money?
 
"I tried the scout setup on an AR"


PLEASE, oh please... put a warning on top of posts like this to swallow coffee before reading. My screen can't stand many more cleanings after I spit out my sip laughing.....


AR and "Scout Rifle" in the same paragraph describing the same gun... priceless.....


:banghead:


Colonel Jeff is rolling in his grave.


"I'm just trying to understand it"


There's no such thing as a semi-auto scout rifle.

"Coopers Commentaries" are available someplace online for free. Read them. Then if you want to own a Scout Rifle, either buy a Steyr, or spend a few $K to build one. The Ruger "Scout" isn't a Scout Rifle, as envisioned by the people who developed the concept (in which I played a small role), although it incorporates several of the correct features.


Willie


.
 
The nice thing about the Ruger GSR is you can try the forward scope mount and if you don't like it, you can stick with the open sights or put on a receiver mounted scope. Having detachable mags mean the stripper clip concept is not necessary and you can scope it however you want. The GSR is a well built compact rifle regardless if it is a scout or not.

I don't know what Savage .308 you have, but if it is a standard type bolt action the only thing the GSR gets you is shorter length* and detachable mags. Maybe open sights, too.

IMO, sticking to the exact Scout recipe is not required if it doesn't suit the shooter. Adjust it and adapt it for your wants or needs. Just like people do with other guns.

*If you remove the flash hider the total length with one stock spacer is 36.5".
 
Last edited:
Coopers concept is very loosely defined, even by Cooper. It could be ANY action type, with or without optics as long as it meets his other criteria. It is easier to make it happen with a bolt rifle.

Steyr is the only company to my knowledge that has ever specifically made a rifle that meets all of his criteria. The Ruger is too heavy to meet Coopers criteria.

Personally I think Cooper's scout concept stinks. There are any number of off the shelf hunting rifles that do the job better than his concept at a lot less cost. Most lever action 30-30's with QD mounts and a 1-4X scope mounted conventionally would be a better gun. As would most lightweight bolt, semi, or pump rifles with irons and the same scope in QD mounts.
 
Lot of definitions of Scout Rifles on the net. So far as I know, what is a Scout? And, if we knew excactly what a scout is, would a Scout really want a rifle that we define as a Scout? Sort of have a feeling that someone had a decent modifiation to a rifle and decided that Scout sounded good. Could have called a Cowboy, Buckaroo, Texan or anything. Scout just sounded best to someone and the name stuck.
 
People kind of get hung up on the "scout" concept. As stated Cooper loosely defined it and modified it several times. Some people think it is written in stone and balk at any questioning of it. In reality it evolved into kind of a romanticized tactical bolt action throwback idea that Cooper came up with. Concept being "what would have been the ideal tactical bolt action in WWI or maybe WWII?"

I've made, owned, used, carried and hunted with a number of scout rifles (including the Steyr) and pseudo scout rifles of various kinds. Frankly, as much as I tried, I never got used to or like the forward mounted scout scopes (BTW, scout rifles don't necessarily have to have a forward mounted scope). Also, I never found any of the "scout rifle" features that were necessary or did anything that a conventional rifle (bolt action or other) couldn't do.
 
Thanks Art! I didn't have the background literature, except wiki which is lacking most of the time.
 
There's no such thing as a semi-auto scout rifle.

Sounds good on paper, deficient in practice, therefore, a poor choice for anyone using it for serious work. Not the way I wanted it to be, just the way it is.

That being said, all my rifles are "scouts" yet none of them fall in line totally with everything Cooper defined it as. They are either too heavy, don't have a forward mounted scope, are semi automatic, aren't a .308, etc etc. However, I propose that a semi-automatic rifle meeting the majority of the requirements laid out in "scout" form will outperform any bolt gun for the same purpose, save for one or two categories weight being the most common.
 
Each person has their own concept of what a' scout rifle ' should be. I believe the concept is sound. I also don't think it is for everyone. But each to their own. I have the Ruger GSR & it is a fine rifle. If you took a 2A1 .308nato B.A. rifle & cut it down or got a jungle carbine. They would work. Or one in .303brit. A para model SKS fits the concept for me even though it's a simi -auto. I know J.C. would never go for it, but hey it's my idea of the scout rifle concept! And you can have yours! No reason to argue or put anyone down! To the op. Do some more research & you will get it or not. But you will be better informed on what you do want in the end. JMO.
 
Bits and pieces: Based on competition in "shoot and scoot" events at Gunsite, the forward mount of the scope does allow faster acquisition of a target. Natch, ya gotta get used to it. :)

I don't like the aesthetics of Steyr's effort, much less the price. :( To me, the butt of the stock is all droopy-drawered.

I have an old Sako 19" carbine in .243 which is seven pounds, with 2x7 scope, sling and ammo. Easy carry. Tack driver. Anyhow, it meets Cooper's idea for overall length. I'm happy with conventionally-mounted scopes, but I have a bunch of decades of using them.

Sixty years ago, I definitely approved of the bipod on a BAR. John Wayne I ain't. Haven't used one since then.

Ruger's effort shoots good. I'd rather have a bit more barrel than that thingummy on the muzzle, and I don't like the hang-down mag. But, I'd call it a good truck gun.

As near as I can tell, I and Cooper agree about what is a "Scout": Somebody who does the sneaky-snake to go find out and then report back, never having been seen by whatever foe there might be. A firefight would mean a blown mission; avoid! We're not talking military combat.

Anyhow, just some notions...
 
i have the GSR and feel it suits the purpose just fine. so it's a bit on the heavy side, big deal. the steyr never appealed to me and i had considered building my own, but honestly, by the time i would've been done, i'd have a bunch more dough into it and have something very similar.
 
"Scout": Somebody who does the sneaky-snake to go find out and then report back, never having been seen by whatever foe there might be. A firefight would mean a blown mission; avoid! We're not talking military combat.

Yet it implies it being used in a service type role, where engagement with an enemy is possible. Again, a semi automatic would still be superior.
 
how about reliability, fireside44. would you say that's one of the categories that a semi won't out perform a bolt gun? that's a pretty big category considering a scout would likely be alone and un-supported.

engagement would be possible but avoided at great length. a bolt gun can be run plenty fast for defensive purposes and the only thing it gives up is mag capacity. what it gains is weight advantage and reliability.
 
"Again, a semi automatic would still be superior"


^^ Perhaps, but then it's not a Scout Rifle....

Read all of the background literature printed while Colonel Jeff was still alive keeping folks from morphing things into something unrelated and the reconsider. There are many FINE rifles, with many FINE attributes. The term "Scout Rifle" is applied to a *particular sort of rifle* and other FINE TOOLS that do their jobs VERY WELL are all well and good... they are just not a "Scout Rifle" as defined by the group of people who developed the concept, spent hours and hours discussing the concept, building prototypes that were tested in the the rigorous Orange Gunsite environment, and then improved, and improved, and improved and improved... it's a fine lineage. Call "other fine rifles" by some other name.

Not a "terrible fan" of the Steyr, but then again I have my own Gunsite-Scout, built there, tested there, and conformal to the description sans-bipod. That was always a tough thing to get right.


Want a cheap Scout? Find a Remington 660 and mount a fixed power intermediate eye relief scope on it and enjoy. That was one of the rifles we looked at in detail when we were trying to pick an off the shelf rifle that was most conformal. It's actually one of the proper genesis-rifles of the breed.


Poking thru Commentaries, I find this:



At SHOT, both Ruger and Winchester displayed what might be called a variation on the scout concept - this being a light, short, comfortable sporting rifle taking a variety of middle powered, center-fire cartridges. They are both nice guns, though they fall quite a way short of the Steyr Scout. The various superior features of the SS such as the integral bipod, the detachable butt magazine and the composition stock, are not part of these packages, and no provision is made for any receiver-mounted, intermediate power telescope. We should note that a telescope sight is not an essential feature of a scout rifle, original or approximation. Scout 1, which is based upon the excellent Remington 600 carbine, accomplished its first mission in Central America with complete satisfaction - without a scope. Telescope sights on rifles are nice to have, and I effected a good deal of pioneering in this direction before World War II, but they are not essential, and in some cases they may be a bit of a handicap. I had a short-range incident with a lion in which the telescope, on what might be called a prototype scout, was distinctly in the way. At eleven steps range, it is difficult to pick up a proper aiming point in a hurry.

These recent attempts at the Scout concept suggest that the basic idea, while not clearly understood, has definite merit. A good many years ago I ran across a deer hunter over in southeastern Arizona who was displaying a sort of cut-down 1903 Springfield which got me thinking. Perhaps the point here is that bench rest accuracy, while interesting to people who compete in that league, is not something which can be appreciated in a general-purpose rifle. Shedding slivers off of group size is a matter of no concern when you are trying to kill something most expeditiously. Scout VI, which is our current "Ready Rifle," prints one-holers at 100 meters, but this has never been an essential attribute during its long and variegated life in the field. Half-minute accuracy, while pleasant to observe, is in no way superior to one-minute accuracy in any serious rifle. Once I saw a sportsman, who bragged up a storm about the fantastic accuracy of his brand new 264, miss a stationary mule deer by a couple of feet at football-field range.




Wise words from the Colonel. RIP.


Willie

.
 
Last edited:
how about reliability, fireside44. would you say that's one of the categories that a semi won't out perform a bolt gun? that's a pretty big category considering a scout would likely be alone and un-supported.

True, a bolt is reliable beyond just about any other format. You're saying scouting alone and unsupported? Scouting what, an area for hunting? Then a gun is hardly required at all except for bears or mountain lions and many non scout guns would work as well or better. A military scout? Then the small disadvantage in reliability is easily surpassed by additional firepower and capacity an autoloading rifle offers.

This is why the whole premise of a scout rifle is flawed. Once you define what you are scouting, the "scout" rifle premise becomes deficient. I can think of few situations where a bolt would be preferable to a autoloading rifle in a military environment except that of extreme accuracy. And if it's just a huntin' spot you are scouting a magnum handgun would probably be more convenient to carry.
 
how about a pic, willie? what are the specs on your rifle, being that you seem so adamant and ridgid about what a scout rifle is or is not.
 
fireside, you paint two scenarios of what you perceive to be "scouting", but you must realize that there are many more, don't you?

also i think you are missing the point that firepower is carved much lower on the totem pole than avoiding detection all together.
 
Last edited:
Not a "terrible fan" of the Steyr, but then again I have my own Gunsite-Scout, built there, tested there, and conformal to the description sans-bipod. That was always a tough thing to get right.

It's a nice rifle, though nearly as expensive as an autoloader in .308/7.62. And yet outside of lighter weight, a marginal increase in accuracy and reliability it offers nothing over a good FAL or similar battle rifle.

fireside, you paint two scenarios of what you perceive to be "scouting", but you must realize that there are many more, don't you?

List them. What other scenarios of scouting does a low cap bolt gun take the cake?
 
"how about a pic, willie? what are the specs on your rifle, being that you seem so adamant and ridgid about what a scout rifle is or is not"


I'll post a pic later, I am flying in the desert and am 1000's of miles from my rifles at present.

A Scout Rifle, by agreed definition of the founders of the concept, is a lightweight bolt action carbine shooting a short-action sized full sized (.30 caliber minimum) cartridge available with ease worldwide, optimized for maximum carriability, and clasically featuring a forward mounted scope of low power. it is designed to be shot with both eyes open, and with one a good shooter can reliably hit thrown clay birds with regularity. Should you not believe this, I suspect that a visit to Gunsite would relieve your skepticism. The classic definition includes a carbine of less than six pounds, non-protruding box magazine allowing carry by the balance point without a magazine interfering, and reliable backup sights to the scope (if fitted). It is invariably fitted with three flush mounted sling swivels mounts, allowing use of a loop-sling attached to forward and middle fittings for precision slung shooting. Desirable characteristics include stripper clip loading and an integral bipod. The latter two features have not yet been fully found in any design built to date. These are the basics set forth by the people who developed the concept. You can build and shoot many other fine designs, but unless the conform to this general description, they are not conformal to the Scout Rifle concept.

Cooper envisioned the Scout mainly as a hunting rifle for the true rifleman. It was designed to be carried a lot, shot once, and then carried a lot. There was an obvious link to military "scouts" but there was no practical connection. It's a hunting and general utility rifle. It is flexibly employed to reliably hit large game sized animals at the ranges expected for such a tool, as well as to be useful for short range snap-shooting without modification or adjustment. it is a jack of all trades, master at none, and allows the trained rifleman a tool with which he perform the tasks of a rifle with minimum fuss and maximum reliability. Any feature not seen as essential has been removed.

Many actions were examined. The Krag Jorgensen actually was a favorite for many reasons including the butter-smooth action, magazone cut-off (another one of Coopers desires), and it's ability to be topped up without opening the bolt. I actually had one made for msyelf with the fulll Scout Rifle specs, but the .30-40 Krag cartridge was not available on the world stage and the action is not adequate for the .308. Copper loved this rifle. BTW. Another examined and admired and carefully studied was the Enfield Jungle Carbine. We used for some time the Remington 600 and 660 rifles as prototypes. Then we used Sakos. And then some CZ's, and finally Remington Model 7's. Finally Steyr built the Scout to Jeff's specifications and he felt it to be nearly perfect.


My own "Gunsite Super-Scout" is a bit of a seque built during the time when we were working on prototypes and concepts. My Krag had already been built, and suited me and Cooper (save for the caliber), but it was "mine" and so I already had a "deer cartridge" Scout and was not going to immediately build one in .308. My next one, built by John at Gunsite to specifications set forth by me and with discussions and advice from Jeff, was to be a "Super Scout", built when we were all enamored with the .350 Remington Magnum "Fireplug", with which Cooper and many of us were very happy with. Having a "deer caliber" Scout in the .30-40 Krag prototype, I decided to see how a .350 Rem Mag Super-Scout would work, hoping along with Jeff that it would be adequate for "most" of Africa as well as all of North America as a medium-bore rifle. Basically Cooper thought that we should each have three rifles: Scout, Super-Scout, and a Heavy (such as his "Baby"). My Super-Scout is the prototype of the 'Medium Scout" designed for General North American use in areas where a .30 caliber Scout would be inadequate for the game of the area. Bottom line is that the .350 was seen as fine for deer "anyplace" when correctly loaded, and would be a thumper for Moose, Bear, etc..

So:

My "Super Scout" started as a rare factory kevlar stocked Remington Model 7 in .350 Remington Magnum. Starting at the back, the recoil pad was rounded to allow a fast shouldering while not snagging on bush-clothes. The stock is fitted with three Pachmeyer flush mounted sling swivels, the third being forward of the magazine to allow proper sling-up using a basic carry sling with the sling re-attached to the middle stud for shooting. a Ruger Mini-30 aperature rear sight is milled into the rear ring of the action., with the aperature drilled out to Ghost Ring specs. The bolt has a Sako extractor fitted. No conventional front sight is fitted, that sight being provided as a milled on stub-sight integral to the silver-soldered on front scope base. That places a front sight sufficiently forward for use, but maintains a perfectly snag-free barrel. Both the forward and rear scope mounts are silver soldered to the BBL, and accept lever-mount rings holding a Scout-Scope, which is a Burris IER with duplex reticle. Note that at this time there was only one IER scope on the market, and this was it. The Rifle weighs in at six and a half pounds, a half pound over perfect-spec. No bipod is fitted, and obviously we never figured out stripper clips. Balance is at the magazine and it can be carried one-handed all day without difficulty. With it I have shot game ranging from Groundhogs to Pennsylvania Deer, to Moose, Pigs, and Bear, all with aplomb and grace. Handloading the cartridge has been very enlightening. At one time I wanted to take it to Africa to hunt Ngati, but a spectacular failure of the .350 Rem Mag for just that job by Cooper caused me to reconsider. A 9.3mm CZ is now joined by a John Wilkes .450 Nitro Express Double made in 1906 for Africa... along with a .30-06 which is still the best general purpose cartridge that has ever been designed. None are "Scout Rifles". They are just "good rifles", the point being that there are many good rifles that do not deserve the name "Scout". Similarly I do not call my Boykin Spaniel a Springer Spaniel, and I note that a Ruger GSR is not a Scout Rifle.


My rifle is a true "Scout Rifle", albeit THE prototype for the Super-Scout. If it were in .308 it would be a pure Scout. Several were built to the same spec at about the same time by John in .308 and were tested exhaustively at Gunsite.


The "rigid" definition of "Scout Rifle" is an Orange Gunsite definition, set forth by mutual consent of the parties involved with it's evolution. Orange Family members do not recognize other definitions. Many things can be changed, and the concept was prototypical, but some things are rigidly set. Deviation from them might produce a fine rifle, but the result is not recognized by the "Breed Standards Comittee" so to speak as a Scout. I'm pleased that the true Scout Rifles have influenced other thoughts and designs, and have influenced manufacturers like Ruger, etc., but these are not seen by purists as the real deal. Close... but... not... really.... "right".


Maybe you needed to have been at the time there to truly get it....



Willie

.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top