Riomouse911
Member
Glick 43X MOS… now I need a dot to take advantage of the MOS slide cut.
Stay safe.
Stay safe.
That is Condition 2. You have to lower the hammer on a loaded chamber to get to Condition 2.A few posters responded that that wasn't safe because you wouldn't recommend lowering the hammer on a loaded chamber? What does that have to do with carrying in condition 2?
Ralph
Oh, that's interesting. Is that the case even with modern 1911 style pistols because I'd consider that a poor design by today's standards. I owned a Beretta 92 FS for a long time and one thing I liked about that pistol was the de-cocking feature. Otherwise, if I owned a 1911 style I'd simply drop the magazine and then rack the slide to unload the weapon as typical.quote by Trackskippy....."The safety on a 1911 can only be put on, when the gun is cocked...Once the safety is on, you can't unload the gun, as it locks the slide."
That's not correct. The safest way to carry any weapon is condition 3 which typically entails (safety on, hammer down, empty chamber). You can never have an accidental discharge of a weapon that is not loaded (chambered). That was the entire purpose of advocating condition 3 in Israel and as others practiced for a long time. The problem is, it leans heavily toward safety whereas condition 1 leans more toward speed.quote by Trackskippy....."The safest way to carry it, is to carry it with a round in the chamber, cocked, with the safety on".
Yes, but that doesn't make condition 2 an unsafe Carry method for a 1911 style pistol, which was my point!quote by JTQ....."That is Condition 2. You have to lower the hammer on a loaded chamber to get to Condition 2."
This comes up periodically in these discussions - Assuming kids watch TV or movies or watch adults handle guns at some point.I'm curious to know what you do, for those of you who carry Locked and Cocked, when you put your weapon away for the night? Because it would be much easier for a child to disengage a safety vs cocking the hammer? This would be another reason I'd be inclined to carry a 1911 in condition 2 or even condition 3.
The key thing here is you don't own a 1911 style pistol, and you came here asking for advice from those that do. Those that do own 1911 style pistols, or other single action semi-auto pistols have told you how they operate them - it is almost universally Condition 1 carry.Hey JTQ and Trackskippy,
Y'all didn't read my original post as I don't own a 1911 style pistol. I was making an inquiry on behalf of a buddy who recently purchased and carries a 1911.
FYI. I am not judging here! I have no problem with people who carry Cocked and Locked as long as they are highly familiar with their weapon and understand the safety features. I've just given my opinion while also trying to understand yours.
Ralph
I read your original; post. I was answering your questions and suggesting you get a 1911 and figure it out, so you understood it, and how it works, so you could educate both yourself and your friend.Hey JTQ and Trackskippy,
Y'all didn't read my original post as I don't own a 1911 style pistol. I was making an inquiry on behalf of a buddy who recently purchased and carries a 1911. Although I think I have convinced him to switch to a different pistol for ccw purposes. I personally carry a striker fired Kahr.
Oh, that's interesting. Is that the case even with modern 1911 style pistols because I'd consider that a poor design by today's standards. I owned a Beretta 92 FS for a long time and one thing I liked about that pistol was the de-cocking feature. Otherwise, if I owned a 1911 style I'd simply drop the magazine and then rack the slide to unload the weapon as typical.
That's not correct. The safest way to carry any weapon is condition 3 which typically entails (safety on, hammer down, empty chamber). You can never have an accidental discharge of a weapon that is not loaded (chambered). That was the entire purpose of advocating condition 3 in Israel and as others practiced for a long time. The problem is, it leans heavily toward safety whereas condition 1 leans more toward speed.
Yes, but that doesn't make condition 2 an unsafe Carry method for a 1911 style pistol, which was my point!
You always load and unload a gun in a safe place with the weapon pointing in a safe direction. So I'd be inclined to chamber a round and then drop the hammer on a 1911. That's how the gun would remain and that's how I'd most likely carry it. There are many times over my 50 years of shooting that I've had to drop a hammer on a weapon that had a round chambered in it out of necessity. Lever action rifles and revolvers are perfect examples. So it's a matter of doing it safely and in a safe place and direction.
I'm curious to know what you do, for those of you who carry Locked and Cocked, when you put your weapon away for the night? Because it would be much easier for a child to disengage a safety vs cocking the hammer? This would be another reason I'd be inclined to carry a 1911 in condition 2 or even condition 3.
FYI. I am not judging here! I have no problem with people who carry Cocked and Locked as long as they are highly familiar with their weapon and understand the safety features. I've just given my opinion while also trying to understand yours.
God Bless,
Ralph
quote RalphIII"The safety on a 1911 can only be put on, when the gun is cocked...Once the safety is on, you can't unload the gun, as it locks the slide."
Oh, that's interesting. Is that the case even with modern 1911 style pistols because I'd consider that a poor design by today's standards. I owned a Beretta 92 FS for a long time and one thing I liked about that pistol was the de-cocking feature. Otherwise, if I owned a 1911 style I'd simply drop the magazine and then rack the slide to unload the weapon as typical.
Well that's unnecessary and you're speaking from a point of complete ignorance. I've carried loaded weapons for nearly 50 years with a strong emphasis on gun safety. Which includes helping with numerous on-going college studies, one by John Hopkins, attempting to create solutions to help reduce gun related injuries. That's why I often challenge folks to defend their views. Because that ultimately helps me to defend your views as well.quote by trackskippy...."At least for you. If carrying a loaded gun makes you uncomfortable, then I would suggest finding something else, and leave the guns at home. We will likely all be better off."
Thanks for all of the input guys and no need to get bent out of shape! It's called a discussion.
I asked how the majority of you carry your 1911 and you answered that. I then inquired as to why you carry in that fashion and for you to defend that and you did. I had already considered the answers because they are all quite reasonable. I however wanted to hear it from you and for you to give a defense given you actually own and/or carry a 1911.
Well that's unnecessary and you're speaking from a point of complete ignorance. I've carried loaded weapons for nearly 50 years with a strong emphasis on gun safety. Which includes helping with numerous on-going college studies, one by John Hopkins, attempting to create solutions to help reduce gun related injuries. That's why I often challenge folks to defend their views. Because that ultimately helps me to defend your views as well.
I don't own a 1911 style pistol but I grew up with revolvers and DA/SA pistols. So, like Tallball, it's quite natural for me to cock a hammer to fire and I can do so very quickly and accurately. Whereas, I have difficulty manipulating pistol thumb safeties and I find them unnatural. So I assumed that condition 2 would be a viable carry option for some folks.
As for myself, I carry a striker fired Kahr 9mm that has a revolver type trigger system which makes it inherently safe. This is the pistol that I often recommend to people who may consider carrying. I would never recommend a 1911 or any pistol with a safety for conceal carry. Because that requires an extra step and it's quite possible a person might initially forget to take the safety off in a high stress situation. That could cost them their life. I've actually seen video of such and it's why I chose the ccw firearm that I did. It's also why I do not recommend pistols with an external safety for carry purposes.
I think the 1911 style pistol is a great gun. I'd just never recommend it for conceal carry unless you have a significant amount of experience with it to the point that it's operation is second nature to you. Otherwise, its exactly as Ron stated "I carry it condition 1 and I am comfortable with that, it works for me. People should choose what works for them as to model and caliber".
Take care,
Ralph
You quoted me out of context.Thanks for all of the input guys and no need to get bent out of shape! It's called a discussion.
I asked how the majority of you carry your 1911 and you answered that. I then inquired as to why you carry in that fashion and for you to defend that and you did. I had already considered the answers because they are all quite reasonable. I however wanted to hear it from you and for you to give a defense given you actually own and/or carry a 1911.
Well that's unnecessary and you're speaking from a point of complete ignorance. I've carried loaded weapons for nearly 50 years with a strong emphasis on gun safety. Which includes helping with numerous on-going college studies, one by John Hopkins, attempting to create solutions to help reduce gun related injuries. That's why I often challenge folks to defend their views. Because that ultimately helps me to defend your views as well.
I don't own a 1911 style pistol but I grew up with revolvers and DA/SA pistols. So, like Tallball, it's quite natural for me to cock a hammer to fire and I can do so very quickly and accurately. Whereas, I have difficulty manipulating pistol thumb safeties and I find them unnatural. So I assumed that condition 2 would be a viable carry option for some folks.
As for myself, I carry a striker fired Kahr 9mm that has a revolver type trigger system which makes it inherently safe. This is the pistol that I often recommend to people who may consider carrying. I would never recommend a 1911 or any pistol with a safety for conceal carry. Because that requires an extra step and it's quite possible a person might initially forget to take the safety off in a high stress situation. That could cost them their life. I've actually seen video of such and it's why I chose the ccw firearm that I did. It's also why I do not recommend pistols with an external safety for carry purposes.
I think the 1911 style pistol is a great gun. I'd just never recommend it for conceal carry unless you have a significant amount of experience with it to the point that it's operation is second nature to you. Otherwise, its exactly as Ron stated "I carry it condition 1 and I am comfortable with that, it works for me. People should choose what works for them as to model and caliber".
Take care,
Ralph
Unless I missed a post, we all have forgotten about the Ruger P95DC (and posibbly other similar makes) which has a decocker lever that drops the hammer on a loaded chamber (while keeping the gun aimed in a safe direction).
That allows one to carry with one in chamber and a heavy trigger pull for that first round (having to cock hammer via trigger). Your thoughts?
View attachment 1098310
Then there is the Series 80 380 Government model . . . It has no grip safety at all. After carrying one for a while I discovered the magazine release tended to release itself now and then. On a positive note, it would still fire (once) without the magazineIf carrying a "cocked and locked" 1911, I would prefer a Series-80 system that is designed to prevent firing pin movement if the weapon is dropped, either landing on its muzzle, or landing on its hammer and breaking the sear interface. The grip safety also provides some redundancy if the thumb safety is inadvertently bumped and something decides to impinge on the trigger.