CSPAN thread for Tuesday 03/02/04

Status
Not open for further replies.
not that they care .. but I just e-mail my sellout Senators letting them know that they lost my vote due to them voting for the Feinstein Amendment (not that they would have got my vote anyway) ..

I urge everyone else whos senators sold them out to do the same ..
 
There still are options.

First, since the House did not vote for this bill in this form (with the AWB), it will have to go to the conference committee. The AWB provision could get stripped there.

I don't know if that is likely.

If the amendments keep getting tacked on, the bill can be killed, and the gun maker protection can be brought back up next year, when it's not an election year.

Right now, I don't know what the thinking is.
 
Yes, I'd say it is time to KILL THIS BILL. The way the Senate just voted, it is unlikely they would approve the clean bill that comes back at them from the House..and there is a small chance that the House might let us down. KILL THIS BILL.
 
Get angry. Don't forget who betrayed us. But also, don't quit calling and writing our elected representatives. There is still conference committee for this thing to get through...if the bill even passes with all of these crummy amendments.

:fire:
 
It will be axed in the House.

Sure about that? I recall Speaker Hastert strongly countering DeLay's assertion that an AWB renewal wouldn't see the light of day.

It looks to me like the AWB is about 75% of the way along towards reauthorization.

I sure hope I am wrong, but doesn't Hastert pick the conference committee. Pretty slick way of doing an end-run around Tom Delay.
 
Sure about that? I recall Speaker Hastert strongly countering DeLay's assertion that an AWB renewal wouldn't see the light of day.

It looks to me like the AWB is about 75% of the way along towards reauthorization.

I sure hope I am wrong.
Exactly. I don't know much about committee, what is there 2 people in their and a secret service agent that hash out details?? What I do know though is that if S.1805 passes then the AWB renewal CAN pass. If it S.1805 dies right now, then the AWB renewal CANT pass. Right?
 
From Thomas.loc.gov

CONFERENCE COMMITTEES AND REPORTS

When the Senate requests a conference or agrees to the House's request for a conference and names its conferees, it informs the House of its action by message. After the second House agrees to the conference, appoints conferees, and apprises the first House of its action by message, all the papers relating to the measure sent to conference (referred to as the "official papers") are transmitted to the conference. This includes the original engrossed bill, engrossed amendments, and the various messages of transmittal between the Houses.

Since the conferees of each House vote as a unit, the House, like the Senate, may appoint as many conferees as it chooses to meet with the Senate conferees to reconcile the differences between the two Houses--the sole purpose of a conference. Thus, having a larger number of conferees than the other House does not provide an advantage.

After deliberation, the conferees may make one or more recommendations; for example, (1) that the House recede from all or certain of its amendments; (2) that the Senate recede from its disagreement to all or certain of the House amendments and agree to the same; or (3) that the conference committee report an inability to agree in all or in part. Usually, however, there is compromise.

Conferees dealing with an amendment or a series of amendments are more limited in their options than conferees dealing with a bill passed by the second House with an amendment in the nature of a substitute. They can only deal with the matters in disagreement. They cannot insert new matter or leave out matter agreed to by both Houses, and if they exceed their authority, a point of order will lie against the conference report. Each House may instruct its conferees, but this is rarely done. Such instructions are not binding since conferences are presumed to be full and free--one House cannot restrict the other House's conferees.

Where one House passes a bill of the other House with an amendment in the nature of a substitute and the measure then goes to conference, the conferees have wider latitude since the entire matter is in conference. They may report a third version on the same subject matter; all of its provisions, however, must be germane modifications of either the House or Senate version, or it will be subject to a point of order.
 
The McCain-Reed Amendment to S. 1805, which closes the gun show "loophole", passes.

Yays: 53

Nays: 46
 
Yes, the entire House has to vote in this.

If it is KILLED, yes, it would make it harder to then get the AWB to pass.

But, it could--and will--still be brought up as a seperate bill that then could still pass again, here in the Senate.

The House would then also need to pass an AWB renewal bill

...then the President would have to sign the joint bill (which he said he would).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top