I mean, I've had people try to take my gun off me at work. That doesn't sound like BS to meSure is a lot of "your a target" BS on here by the tupperware crowd.
I don't open carry =/= I don't support your Right to do so.Lawmakers take that as "well, if some gun owners are against it. Then we won't support it."
But restrictive laws and regulations can be enacted and issued.Rights cannot be taken away because of flagrant misbehavior by a minority of the citizenry.
What bills were those?As for MO, you have a Republican Supermajority that has refused to advance pro-gun bills. I was just on Marc Cox's show discussing that issue.
What is your e.d.c.? At home I usually wear an El Paso holster & gunbelt with a single-action Colt or Colt clone. I can't get used to Kydex for some reason.
Republican House Majority Leader Jonathan Patterson, instructed House Republicans this year to no longer pursue the two bills. One would allow guns on public transit and inside churches and the other would exempt firearms and ammunition from sales taxes.What bills were those?
It's the same way in a lot of states, but that's not going to stop law enforcement from stopping or the general public from dailing 911 (then L.E. stops you). You still maybe harassed, will have to follow orders, and will have zero recourse after the fact.Without joining the OC/CC debate, I will point out that the newly enacted Permitless Carry law, here in SC, provides that the mere presence of a firearm does not justify a stop without a "reasonable, articulable suspicion" that a crime has been or is being committed.
I agree 100%! At least in PA it's easy to get your permit, then you can carry concealed or open without the hassle.PA's open carry is kind of silly really. And if you think about it, assuming those doing it even know, it causes unnecessary administrative handling, which just makes things more dangerous if you have to constantly unload and load getting in and out of your car.
And then there's Philly, where you still need the permit, open carry or not.
Just means your not as aware of your surroundings as you think you are. Or like the cop in Las Cruces, did something stupid.I mean, I've had people try to take my gun off me at work. That doesn't sound like BS to me
In FL, since we don't have open carry. You can get arrested.It's the same way in a lot of states, but that's not going to stop law enforcement from stopping or the general public from dailing 911 (then L.E. stops you). You still maybe harassed, will have to follow orders, and will have zero recourse after the fact.
Why would anyone think that?Just means your not as aware of your surroundings as you think you are. Or like the cop in Las Cruces, did something stupid.
Because nobody is as aware of their surroundings as they think they areWhy would anyone think that?
Neither are you. I guarantee it.Just means your not as aware of your surroundings as you think you are.
You don't have to make a stupid mistake all you need to do is make a mistake.Or like the cop in Las Cruces, did something stupid.
From Guidance sent by State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) to law enforcement:It's the same way in a lot of states, but that's not going to stop law enforcement from stopping or the general public from dailing 911 (then L.E. stops you). You still maybe harassed, will have to follow orders, and will have zero recourse after the fact.
As I stated, other states have similar laws, but it's not going to stop law enforcement from still stopping and temporarily detaining you. There are even dozens of YouTube "audit" channels that purposely stand outside of business and police stations video taking or who go open carrying purposely waiting for law enforcement to to make contact so that they can lecture them, in vain, about their Constitutional rights. There are open carriers who have had cops called on them and L.E. will still show up and interrogate and ID you. I've seen, in more cases than I can remember, law enforcement use mental gymnastics as justification to get around laws as well, so they'll come up with a "reasonable and articulable" to stop you one way or another.From Guidance sent by State Law Enforcement Division (SLED) to law enforcement:
"Possession of a firearm alone is NOT a reason to stop an individual. To make a stop,
there must be reasonable and articulable suspicion a crime has occurred. Law
enforcement officers cannot conduct a stop solely because a firearm is visible."
Of course they can. As Styx noted, all it takes is for the majority to pressure their representatives, or to vote in new representatives to get the laws changed. Even the constitution can be changed with a sufficient majority.Rights cannot be taken away because of flagrant misbehavior by a minority of the citizenry.
That is one reason I support the right to open carry. And it is also one reason why this statement is false:In FL, since we don't have open carry. You can get arrested.
Even if I never plan to open carry in public, it's quite useful and comforting to me to know that if I unintentionally leave my property without covering my gun, or expose it in public unintentionally, I'm not going to suffer any legal consequences.A right not exercised -- however infrequently -- is useless.
There's no way to go through life without ever letting anyone get close enough to you to grab an openly carried gun. And even if that actually were possible, it's no defense against someone seeing your gun and committing an armed robbery to take it.Just means your not as aware of your surroundings as you think you are.
@JohnKSa said Of course they can. As Styx noted, all it takes is for the majority to pressure their representatives, or to vote in new representatives to get the laws changed. Even the constitution can be changed with a sufficient majority.Rights cannot be taken away because of flagrant misbehavior by a minority of the citizenry.
And once again, I was speaking to the fact that governance today stands ready at a moment's notice to rob citizens of their natural rights, ready to pounce once it's noted that the citizens have become complacent or skittish about actually exercising their rights.And it is also one reason why this statement is false:
Even if I never plan to open carry in public, it's quite useful and comforting to me to know that if I unintentionally leave my property without covering my gun, or expose it in public unintentionally, I'm not going to suffer any legal consequences.
It's sometimes hard to get shades of meaning or sarcasm from the written word. I assumed you were speaking literally about reality.I'm sure you (and @Styx really knew that I was speaking philosophically, toward the ideal, rather than the pathetic reality we now face.
Well, if you are, you are doing so in spite of clear statements that the arguments against open carry are not about rights but about practicality. Sort of ironic that you would chide others for failing to realize that you were trying to speak philosophically instead of about reality in your posts while at the same time blatantly contradicting what others are plainly saying.I really am starting to think that some here are just fine with picking and choosing which parts of the right to keep and bear arms they want to defend.
If you actually read the thread, I think you would see that there is actually not consensus about the disadvantages of open carry. In fact, if you read my post, I responded to someone who was arguing against a disadvantage that someone pointed out.NO ONE here has pretended that the disadvantages of open carry don't exist....There's no need to keep repeating this.
This is a strawman. No one is saying this. This is something you have made up....thus is not necessary and there's no real reason to fight for it,...
In the words of @Kleanbore, you missed me there... went through my previous posts in the thread, and it was clear to me at least, that I was mostly speaking of rights.Well, if you are, you are doing so in spite of clear statements that this is not about rights but about practicality. Sort of ironic that you would chide others for failing to realize that you were trying to speak philosophically instead of about reality in your posts while at the same time blatantly contradicting what others are plainly saying.