I guess I've been too indirect. No, I don't care for the Glock as a matter of engineering or of aesthetics, but that isn't why I dislike them so much. I dislike them most of all because of the attitude of many of their owners. Reason 7 of Post 5 was sincere. Yeah, it was a laugh line, but it was also sincere. Glock owners could have their gun and, so long as I wasn't too nearby, they'd have my blessing; better a Glock than a Jiminez. But incredibly, they appear to believe, and regularly insist, that they're not merely acceptable guns (which is a debatable point) but actually good guns. It's like those cheesy television ads for McDonald's or Burger King from twenty-five to thirty years ago. Not content to sell the speed and convenience of their product delivery, they actually tried to convince people that their crap sandwiches tasted good. And that eventually begins to grate on the sensibilities of some of us. I mean, I enjoy an occasional Egg McMuffin or Big Fish on the road, but I don't kid myself into believing they are actually a superior sandwich. They're an acceptable substitute for a real meal, accepted for their speed and for their convenience of delivery. Similarly with Glocks. They really aren't all that bad. But it gets old, hearing day and night how a cheap plastic gun is good. If it were made in Brazil, it would be thrashed all over these boards. But no -- it's made in Fuehrercountry, so it must be magical plastic.