Alright, who is the SOB that came up with the match this month!
It is almost as if he knew exactly what my weakness was and designed a match around it. Oh, yeah, that was me!
My results were not as good as I had hoped. My plan worked too well when I designed the match. I knew I could do OK groups at 50 yards most of the time; especially if it was just 3 rounds and sometimes 5 rounds. That is why I specified 10 rounds for the match. You have to stay focused and perform for all ten to get a good score.
I shot my S&W M41 for the rimfire class and my Colt 1911 in 9mm for the centerfire class. (I thought a smaller hole would be better than a .45 given the reverse scoring....it didn't help me one bit). In both cases my first target was the worst and everything seemed to go fine until the 9th or 10th round; then unseen forces made them go astray and kill my scores. I even nicked the 5 ring on one of the 9mm targets but, the "score the lower ring" rules this month means that target was a big, fat, Greek Zero!:banghead:
THR Member Name –Photo_guy
Low Ring Target1__50__ Low Ring Target2___70__
Average Score _60___/100 __1_/X
Class -- Standard Rimfire
Weapon -- S&W M41
Caliber – .22
THR Member Name –Photo_guy
Low Ring Target1__ZERO__ Low Ring Target2___60__
Average Score _30___/100 __1_/X
Class -- Standard Centerfire
Weapon -- Colt 1911a1
Caliber – 9mm
An image of my targets is attached with the low score rounds marked for easy identification. Ugh.
Oh, and as I suspected, I am sure to loose the "Most dedicated shooter" competion for this month. My range conditions were great - It was sunny and 73 degrees today. I actually shot at an indoor range so I had no wind or windchill to deal with either. Gotta love Texas.