"Better" is usually in the eyes of the beholder and based on what they have and know, vs what, if any real experience they have with other things. Which I think more often than not, isn't usually a whole lot, and a lot of times, the same goes for what they have and like.
How many have actually shot the gun they have and like to the point things break, and the guns are wearing out, to even know if or not it really is better?
If you haven't actually run a bunch of different makes and types through the mill to the point above to see which one really is better, "better" is really meaningless.
I think if you pick a gun from a maker of known quality and has a decent rep, and you spend some quality time with it, shooting and working with it, to know it is what you want, you'll be fine. Whether or not its really what you want and "better", is up to you to prove out, and that requires some work and $$$ on your part. Pretty pics arent the way to pic a gun.
All that matters for each of us is, does it work for you and can you make it work?
All the constant whining you hear about grip angles, triggers, this and that, etc, are really just a lack of experience on the shooters part, and not usually the guns fault. If you cant shoot it, that's not the guns fault either.
The only way to know with any of them, is going to cost you a good bit of time, effort, and ammo in shooting a bunch of them. At the end of that, you'll be pretty close to knowing which one is "better". At least til the next pretty pic gets posted.