AStone
Member
I'll confess that I'm still of mixed mind on this one.
Now, please note that my sig line is "levers & wheels".
I'm a revolver guy.
Yet, for some unexplained reason,
when it comes to a matching .22 handgun for my 39,
I'm still leaning towards a semi-auto pistol.
Can't explain it. Sheer heresy.
I'm even uncomfortable with it in [strike]some[/strike] most ways.
But it's true.
I've handled (but not shot) a Smith 617.
It just felt too heavy (45 oz!) for a .22 to carry regularly in the woods.
I suspect it'd get left in camp instead of thrown into the pack.
Range work? Sure. Heavy is good.
But in wilderness, where a pack is involved, when the rifle is a center fire, but I want that .22 handgun for a close squirrel for the pot, no, sorry, heavy just won't cut it. (I'm a smaller than average guy, and when walking long distances, especially backpacking, I count ounces.)
That Buckmark Hunter is 3 oz lighter than a Single Six, and holds more ammo.
It's got better (?) mount options for a scope. It's faster (?) for a second shot than a Single Six. (Another confession: never even held a Single Six, let alone shot one. But aren't single actions doggedly slow?)
I dunno, just wrestling with this, doubting myself.
I have an open mind. No money to buy anything right now anyway, so will continue to read.
Meanwhile, my 39 is still at the smiths.
I miss my 39.
So much work to do with it before I buy a .22 handgun companion for it ...
Now, please note that my sig line is "levers & wheels".
I'm a revolver guy.
Yet, for some unexplained reason,
when it comes to a matching .22 handgun for my 39,
I'm still leaning towards a semi-auto pistol.
Can't explain it. Sheer heresy.
I'm even uncomfortable with it in [strike]some[/strike] most ways.
But it's true.
I've handled (but not shot) a Smith 617.
It just felt too heavy (45 oz!) for a .22 to carry regularly in the woods.
I suspect it'd get left in camp instead of thrown into the pack.
Range work? Sure. Heavy is good.
But in wilderness, where a pack is involved, when the rifle is a center fire, but I want that .22 handgun for a close squirrel for the pot, no, sorry, heavy just won't cut it. (I'm a smaller than average guy, and when walking long distances, especially backpacking, I count ounces.)
That Buckmark Hunter is 3 oz lighter than a Single Six, and holds more ammo.
It's got better (?) mount options for a scope. It's faster (?) for a second shot than a Single Six. (Another confession: never even held a Single Six, let alone shot one. But aren't single actions doggedly slow?)
I dunno, just wrestling with this, doubting myself.
I have an open mind. No money to buy anything right now anyway, so will continue to read.
Meanwhile, my 39 is still at the smiths.
I miss my 39.
So much work to do with it before I buy a .22 handgun companion for it ...