dfariswheel
Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2002
- Messages
- 6,657
MP-43:
With Marlin's there really is no preferred era for accuracy, they all seem to shoot with a high degree of accuracy.
As for quality, meaning fit and finish, like most things, the earlier the better.
It seems that the super tight fit of wood to metal started dropping the most in the mid-1970's, but doesn't seem to have gotten much worse since the mid-1980's.
The older rifles made up until sometime in the late 1960's?? had the butt stock fitted by induction heating the receiver tangs, and pressing the wood on.
This actually "scorched" the wood to a tight fit, and on many older rifles you can see scorching on the wood if you remove the stock.
I don't know if Marlin still does this or not.
It looks like at some point Marlin stopped fitting the wood as closely to the rear tang areas, leaving a gap between the tangs and the wood and the receiver bolsters, but still very tight on the tang sides.
In any event, more recent rifles have gaps at the rear of the tangs, and don't meet the receiver bolsters as tightly as older guns.
The quality of the actual metal work seems to still be high, and accuracy is as good as anything in the past.
Where Marlin has compromised is in the use of the rebounding hammer and the cross-bolt safety. This is an abomination to traditionalist, but DOES make the rifle safer for the average shooter.
Another area where things have fallen is in the walnut. It's gotten lighter and lighter since the late 1970's, until it's an almost blond color today.
This is a pattern that seems to have affected all gun makers over the same time frame, and is probably due to the expense and difficulty in getting good American walnut.
In the older guns, every now and then you see some really fancy figured walnut turn up. Today's guns seem to be pretty plain wood without even the nice straight grain as used on the guns made in the late 1940's and early 1950's.
Bottom line is, for shooting purposes there are seldom bad Marlin's of any era.
For quality of fit and finish, and appearance of wood, the older guns are better.
With Marlin's there really is no preferred era for accuracy, they all seem to shoot with a high degree of accuracy.
As for quality, meaning fit and finish, like most things, the earlier the better.
It seems that the super tight fit of wood to metal started dropping the most in the mid-1970's, but doesn't seem to have gotten much worse since the mid-1980's.
The older rifles made up until sometime in the late 1960's?? had the butt stock fitted by induction heating the receiver tangs, and pressing the wood on.
This actually "scorched" the wood to a tight fit, and on many older rifles you can see scorching on the wood if you remove the stock.
I don't know if Marlin still does this or not.
It looks like at some point Marlin stopped fitting the wood as closely to the rear tang areas, leaving a gap between the tangs and the wood and the receiver bolsters, but still very tight on the tang sides.
In any event, more recent rifles have gaps at the rear of the tangs, and don't meet the receiver bolsters as tightly as older guns.
The quality of the actual metal work seems to still be high, and accuracy is as good as anything in the past.
Where Marlin has compromised is in the use of the rebounding hammer and the cross-bolt safety. This is an abomination to traditionalist, but DOES make the rifle safer for the average shooter.
Another area where things have fallen is in the walnut. It's gotten lighter and lighter since the late 1970's, until it's an almost blond color today.
This is a pattern that seems to have affected all gun makers over the same time frame, and is probably due to the expense and difficulty in getting good American walnut.
In the older guns, every now and then you see some really fancy figured walnut turn up. Today's guns seem to be pretty plain wood without even the nice straight grain as used on the guns made in the late 1940's and early 1950's.
Bottom line is, for shooting purposes there are seldom bad Marlin's of any era.
For quality of fit and finish, and appearance of wood, the older guns are better.