I don't doubt though, that commie DA's or general lawyers would try to have a field day twisting that statement.
They have already done it. Somewhere here there a discussion of the case.
I don't doubt though, that commie DA's or general lawyers would try to have a field day twisting that statement.
They have already done it. Somewhere here there a discussion of the case.
Yeah. A man in good' ol gun friendly Arizona spent a good while in jail at tr a justified defensive shooting that killed no one, and one reason is that he had a training chart containing that phrase. That's in our stickies here. The statement goes to state of mind.Anyone care to translate this for me?
The only part of that that will be evident is color.If you are a straight, white, conservative God fearing person who defends themselves against anything other than that, you will be crucified.
Re-read the above story about the Arizona case.The second part of my quote which seems to be causing some frustration, "have a plan to kill everyone you meet", is simply preparedness. Its not "blood lust" or anything else.
That's bunk, and it indicates a very high degree of naivete. The statement not be twisted to indicate the the actor may well have been predisposed to violence. It could destroy, or make much more difficult, a defense of justification in a justified defensive use of force incident.I don't doubt though, that comm.ie DA's or general lawyers would have a field day trying to twist that statement.
"Probably"?Prosecuting a BG is probably the proper thing to do,
What might the financial condition of a suspect have to do with it?...but there isn't much money, in jailing, and charging some individual who has no money.
That could affect civil claims, but not prosecution.A gun owner is far more likely to become a revenue stream, because he has deeper pockets than a BG.
He likely has no knowledge of your net worth.This is one of the reasons why your BG is targeting you (or him), in the first place, wealth.
He likely has no knowledge of your net worth.
Do you believe that the cost of a legal defense will have much to do with how much the defendant can afford? A destitute defendant may rate a public defender, but that allowance may not begin to go the distance.Have no doubt, once you are in trouble, your Defense Attorney will figure out your net worth, in short order, and in some unfortunate instances, act accordingly.
The thread is about recognizing imminent danger in time to avoid it.How about, "Have a plan to deal appropriately with each person that you meet if they might happen to attack you."
Well, avoidance is an appropriate way to deal with many threats.The thread is about recognizing imminent danger in time to avoid it.
It is THE thing to do, if it is safely possible.Well, avoidance is an appropriate way to deal with many threats
It is THE thing to do, if it is safely possible.
When you consider the fact that the vast majority of attacks, especially like being described, typically take place when the aggressor has the odds heavily weighted in his (their) favor, the wisest choice is most often avoidance.
A friend once offered me the adage "nobody gets out of a knife fight without bleeding". Similar sayings may be made about many other types of attack, especially against odds stacked against you.
And even if you must fight (even with a firearm), distance is most often best integrated into your tactics. Distance equals more time and greater safety options.
Be alert, and avoid if at all possible.
Not sure if that’s wisdom,knowledge or common sense. Yet I agree with it and the Previous txt’s that are “Identical” with that ideology.