I do get your idea. However, what Titan was made in the time when +p+ ammo was available? The question is nil because it is unanswerable. It's like asking what kind of Apple IIE has DVD-ROM burning capabilities? It doesn't, because technology, at the time, did not allow for it. Also, I did not know that Titans came in .45... I'll have to keep my eyes open.
The Hi-Point website says that they will take +P and +P+ loads, which would be impressive, if not for the fact that they probably wont last long like a Titan Tiger wouldn't last long. Will a Tiger take +P loads? Sure, but just like the HP, it would have to be sent back to the factory. The Tiger my father has is dated either in the late 1960s or early 1970s, if I am not mistaken.
Please do not misunderstand me... if that is all you can afford, that is fantastic that you (not you, but the general editoral YOU) took the initiative to purchase a fire arm to protect your loved ones, your home and yourself. I just have a hard time wondering why someone would chose it over something a little more expensive when the value of the slightly higher priced firearm seems to get you the proverbial bigger bang for your buck than what a Hi Point does.
Hi-Point seems to have a pretty strong fan base and their carbines seem to be a real deal at just over 150 dollars. However, their reputation as to why they have such a strong fan base is what rubs me the wrong way. A gun that has terrific customer service that accepts a gun for repairs, no questions asked, is terrific. However, no gun should have to be taken in for repairs to begin with. If you are buying a gun to trust your life with, it should earn that trust at not needing serviced. I know there are countless cases where other firearms have failed, but they do not seem proportionate to HP failings. I'd really like to know their percentage rate of sold firearms versus having those some firearms returned to their factory for servicing verses someone like Springfield for their XDs or Ruger for their SP101.