Why we're gonna lose in the long run

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, not really Khe Sahn, that historical comparision would not hold up. I doubt the Iraqi's have anything like the numbers for a Khe Sahn style seige. More like those German units in Russia in WWII, that kept getting their supplys cut off by Russian partisains. The partisans never overran major German formations, but cut off beans and bullets at times, to such an extent as to make some large formations vitualy immoble, just at the time those formations were needed the most.
 
Fallujah: a ghost town where scared residents bury their dead in their yards
by Deborah Pasmantier

BAGHDAD, April 11 (AFP) - The battled-scarred Sunni bastion of Fallujah west of here became a ghost town where frightened residents lived like rats, fearing to venture out, and many were forced to bury their dead in their yards.

Refugees from the city described the days of fear before the ceasefire which was scheduled to come into force Sunday.

With US marines locked in nasty street fighting with wily rebels, residents were trapped indoors, a stadium has been transformed into a graveyard and bodies littering the streets are hastily moved in blankets.

"As soon as the Americans see a group of people in the streets, they shoot at them, people venture out only if their homes risk being bombarded or if they must carry the dead or wounded to the city's clinics," said Abbas Ibrahim, a 30-year-old Fallujah resident who was able to escape the city Friday.

"They put them in blankets and dart through the streets."

"When there are bodies in the streets, neighbors run to get them. The stadium has been turned into a graveyard, as the town cemetery lies outside the city," he added. "I saw people bury their dead in their yards because they feared to venture out."

Families were only able to leave the town from Friday, following the US marines' assault from Monday to flush out rebels responsible for last week's brutal murder of four US contractors.

"Fallujah is a ghost town, a battlefield," said a Red Crescent official, Mohammed Ibrahim Abbas, who was able to reach Fallujah's central district Thursday to deliver medical supplies.

"The streets were deserted, no cars, all the shops were closed, homes and stores bombarded," he added.

Some 2,000 marines taking part in Operation Vigilant Resolve rolled into the town Monday riding on tanks and armored vehicles through the southern industrial zone.

"Late Sunday, there were heavy bombings, the market was hit. When we woke up, we saw roads and two bridges blocked, tanks ringing the town, planes, US snipers," said Haitham Assad, a 20-year-old member of the para-military Iraqi Civil Defense Corps who reached Baghdad Thursday.

Since then fighting was non-stop in the outlying districts and in the industrial zone, but the center was still in rebel hands, according to the witnesses.

"Marines armed with machine-guns are taking up positions behind stores, on rooftops, in streets. The insurgents too," said Qussai Ali Hassen, another Red Crescent official who was caught in the cross-fire.

"The mujahedeen (Islamic fighters), aged 20 to 35 and armed with rocket propelled grenades and Kalashnikov assault rifles, are positioned around the US troops. They are trying to stop them from reaching the center. I saw hundreds of mujahedeen, some say thousands," said Abbas Ibrahim.

"When US soldiers are in trouble, they call for air support. There are also bombardments in the center. Several of my friends died in their homes," he added.

Fallujah's general hospital lies outside the town limits, so five small clinics have been turned into makeshift hospitals.

But they can treat only two dozen patients at a time and lack equipment.

Haitham Assad, who was injured in the leg and wrist, spent 48 hours there. "There were plenty of bodies lying on the floor," he said.

"The mujahedeen bring their wounded, who are treated along with civilians in miserable conditions," said Hassen, quoting local doctors.

"Surgeons lack anesthetics and post-surgery medication," said Mohammed Ibrahim Abbas of the Red Crescent.

More than 400 Iraqis have been killed and over 1,000 wounded during the fighting, according to an Iraqi official.
http://www.reliefweb.int/w/rwb.nsf/480fa8736b88bbc3c12564f6004c8ad5/0b3694b7d1beafc1c1256e73006baf82

Who is the enemy, now? Is this how to win hearts and minds and therefore the war (on terrorism?)?
 
Tough! If the non combatant/civilian Iraqis in Faluja don't want to suffer the results of a Marine led cleanup then they ought to turn in the insurgents to the coalition forces. If they aren't willing to do that then by giving aid and comfort they're as much an insurgent as those carrying weapons.

Which begs the question if Islam is such a religion of peace like all the bleeding heart, politically correct left wing, cry babies say then why aren't islamic clerics denouncing this uprising in swarms instead of just the one who basically says gee guys play nice - it's ok to kill Americans just don't burn 'em up afterwards.

They're getting what they deserve. If the Iraqis want it to stop they know what they have to do. But they won't because they don't want the killing to stop - they like it - they're freaking barbarians so they get treated like freaking barbarians.
 
Werewolf, the tactics you support will destroy what's left of the "coalition".

US tactics tragic - UK officer
By Sean Rayment

London: Senior British commanders have condemned American military tactics in Iraq as heavy-handed and disproportionate.

One senior Army officer said that America's aggressive methods were causing friction among allied commanders and that there was a growing sense of "unease and frustration" among the British high command.

The officer, who agreed to the interview on the condition of anonymity, said part of the problem was that American troops viewed Iraqis as untermenschen - the Nazi expression for "sub-humans."

Speaking from his base in southern Iraq, the officer said: "My view and the view of the British chain of command is that the Americans' use of violence is not proportionate and is over-responsive to the threat they are facing.

"They don't see the Iraqi people the way we see them. They view them as untermenschen. They are not concerned about the Iraqi loss of life in the way the British are. Their attitude towards the Iraqis is tragic, it's awful.
…
http://www.gulf-news.com/Articles/Region2.asp?ArticleID=117591
 
I wonder if the Brits would feel that way if they were responsible for the Sunni triangle instead of Basra?

IMO winning the hearts and minds of an islamist is impossible. Our cultures are just too different.

So what's the alternative - pacification until we turn the government over to whoever and leave.

Hell - if it were up to me we'd turn it over today and be gone with all our men and equipment as soon as possible thereafter.

Let 'em have a civil war - they'll be too busy killing each other to bother with us - at least for awhile anyway.

In the long run it is my firm belief that the west and east are in the first stages of a religious/culture war and the only possible resolution is the utter destruction of one or the other. Too bad the west is so ate up with playing nice that the eventual outcome will be the destruction of western civilization.
 
If you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds will soon follow.
"The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers." Princess Leia to Governor Tarkin.

A quote from that leftist series, Star Wars.
 
If I remember correctly, Carter turned his back and said let them have their civil war and Khomeini and the Terror Exporting Islamic Theocracy that is modern day Iran was the result. Just letting the Iraqi's have their little civil war is somewhat short sighted as we already know who the winner of that fight would be,

I'm not at all shocked that British officers would use a German term for subhuman...it sort of deflects the worlds attention away from terms like "Subject of her Majesty the Queens East India Company"...Which used to be the grander English phase used to describe third world subhumans.

Yeah, the Brit's have a lot of room to talk about taking over entire counties and draining them of their resources, while treating the natives like subhumans.

The Brit's treated more people like subhumans, that the Germans ever thought about on their best day. The East India Company starved more people than Hitler gassed.
 
"They don't see the Iraqi people the way we see them. They view them as untermenschen. They are not concerned about the Iraqi loss of life in the way the British are. Their attitude towards the Iraqis is tragic, it's awful.
Yeah.... that might just have something to do with them burning our contractors, then dancing around their flaming bodies, and subsequently hanging them from a bridge. Sorry, but the Iraqi people have almost expended our existing stock of loving kindness. You can only behave like brutal barbarians for so long before the desire to help just fades away.
I wouldn't say that we view them as the Nazi's viewed Jews. How about we view them more like, say... Brits viewed the Mahdi's "fuzzy wuzzies" at Omdurman?
That seems a more apt comparison.
 
Why we will lose in the long run is because we, as an entity, have lost sight of what our constitutional provisions entails, & it's got jack to do with anything "overseas."

It matters about here = what our constitutions says we can do, what it says we can't do (by omission) & what we should be about - the here & now.

We seem to be so occupied about "fixing" other folks' things & we have lost sight of our own soul - as a country.

We have trashed every aspect of our own bill of rights, while attempting to "provide" evryone else on earth these same "benifits of democracy."

It has all become a lie.

Since we do not cherish it, nor believe it in the first place, there is no way we can export it to any other country.

We have already lost it here & if such, why would anybody believe otherwise? That, & so much more.

& that is why we will lose.

Fact is, we've already lost. Just haven't sunk in yet, has it?

I couldn't be more sad.
 
The revolts in Iraq appear to have been planned in advance and pretty well coordinated. However, it does not seem terribly widespread. It does not appear there are that many Iraqi and foreign fighters overall.

Also, it seems the truces are more or less holding. It could be the resistance may have had enough for a while.

I was reading in the English version of al-Jazeera today that most of the Iraqis and others who were killed and wounded by US troops were from gunshot wounds with the inference that they were mostly hit by our snipers.

I doubt if our snipers are intentionally shooting women, children and the elderly unless they are participating in the fighting.
 
if it were up to me we'd turn it over today and be gone with all our men and equipment as soon as possible thereafter.

What a tempting thought, Werewolf. It might be the thing to do, but then we risk having another Afghanistan.

It's like holding a wolf by the ears. You don't like it but you don't dare let it go. If we leave the country to its own devices, we may well find out later that we need to go back in. The American people will then righteously argue of the wastefullness of taking the hill twice.

Whether we were chasing WMD's or not, the fact remains that we are there, and we must do our best to give that nation a good chance to develop a government. In the end, its their country to win or lose. What I would like to see is the Iraqis start fighting for their own self government. That is the ultimate goal of everyone who has fought and died there, and in the end, what brings worth to their sacrifice.
 
I dunno, W4RMA, "reliefweb" and "gulfnews"? They don't sound to objective to me.

One of my main frustrations with the renewed heavy fighting is that I can't find any damn source that is free of left or right spin.:banghead:

Therefore I have no idea what is going on.

I am tired of hearing Iraqi's quoted as saying that Marines are deliberately slaughtering women and children (and not having it noted that there is no proof of the claims) and I am equally tired of hearing US officials saying "all is well" with no backup.

To a certain extent its been this way sine 10/7/01.
 
We cannot leave Iraq for a very long time. Pulling our forces out now would contradict both our stated and unstated reasons for invading the country in the first place. We have shouldered the conqueror’s burden, and now we must bear it.

~G. Fink
 
Yeah, the Brit's have a lot of room to talk about taking over entire counties and draining them of their resources, while treating the natives like subhumans.

If I said that something that happened tomorrow in the Philippines was the fault of the US because of the Spanish-American War you'd rightfully tell me that it was over 100 years ago and Theodore Roosevelt and the rest are all long dead. Think about that.

Back on topic. Michael Howard leader of the Conservative Party suggested the other day that there should be a British person directly beneath Paul Bremer in order to maintain British input on post-war Iraq. Maybe he wants to score points off Blair somehow, or maybe it reflects concern over the way things are being handled.
 
If we do lose in the long run, the responsibility for our loss will sit squarely on the shoulders of all those folks who are spouting leftist anti-war drivel.
Absolutely. It certainly won't be because Bush stampeded into a war grossly underestimating the enemy's will to fight, alienated all the countries we needed as allies, had no actual plan to control the country once we were there, failed to perceive the lesson of Britain and Israel which is that a major military power can be held in a long grueling war of attrition by a small number of determined guerillas. It sure won't be for any of those irrelevant reasons.... it will be because people criticised Bush.:barf:
 
The revolts in Iraq appear to have been planned in advance and pretty well coordinated. However, it does not seem terribly widespread. It does not appear there are that many Iraqi and foreign fighters overall.
OK, and now the bad news: it doesn't take many to terrorize and keep a country in turmoil for an extended period of time (IRA ring a bell?).
 
"They don't see the Iraqi people the way we see them. They view them as untermenschen. They are not concerned about the Iraqi loss of life in the way the British are. Their attitude towards the Iraqis is tragic, it's awful.
And that's from our closest ally in the region.....I wonder what the Arab states think of our "assault on Fallujah"?
 
If we do lose in the long run, the responsibility for our loss will sit squarely on the shoulders of all those folks who are spouting leftist anti-war drivel.

I'm with bountyhunter on this one. I also note that on this forum we are big in to taking responsibility, be it for an ND or another mistake. However, as soon as politics is brought in - EVERYTHING becomes the fault of the leftists. The first respondants on the thread about the legal challenge to Ohio CCW used the term 'leftist' about the woman concerned despite the thinnest of evidence. Nope, everything that has ever gone wrong ever is the fault of the left.

I know one or two 'leftists' who I admire despite political differences because they admit when they are wrong or have made a mistake. They also admit some of the failures of their ideology (or at least it's extreme form). Makes me think.
 
The rest of the story...

My comments in italics.


Although no formal complaints have as yet been made to their American counterparts, the officer said the British Government was aware of its commanders' "concerns and fears".

It's such a big problem that we haven't made a point to complain about it formally. So, we just take your word on it then?? Like the sub-human attitude of the US forces. Right??

The officer explained that, under British military rules of war, British troops would never be given clearance to carry out attacks similar to those being conducted by the US military, in which helicopter gunships have been used to fire on targets in urban areas.

It is all urban Einstein. I guess the British just run away when the shooting starts??

British rules of engagement only allow troops to open fire when attacked, using the minimum force necessary and only at identified targets.

Like firing points located with mortar-locating radar.

The American approach was markedly different: "When US troops are attacked with mortars in Baghdad, they use mortar-locating radar to find the firing point and then attack the general area with artillery, even though the area they are attacking may be in the middle of a densely populated residential area.

I would suggest the innocents leave these densely populated residential areas or give the US intel on the insurgents.

"They may well kill the terrorists in the barrage but they will also kill and maim innocent civilians. That has been their response on a number of occasions. It is trite, but American troops do shoot first and ask questions later. They are very concerned about taking casualties and have even trained their guns on British troops, which has led to some confrontations between soldiers.

kill the terrorists - good
innocent civilians - just throw your weapon in the ditch and now you are an innocent civilian


"The British response in Iraq has been much softer. During and after the war the British set about trying to win the confidence of the local population. There have been problems, it hasn't been easy but on the whole it was succeeding."

It's easier to be soft when you are not constantly under fire.

The officer believed that America had now lost the military initiative in Iraq, and it could only be regained with carefully planned, precision attacks against the "terrorists".

He just said they were intermingled with the "innocent civilians". I guess it is not as easy as he would like for it to appear.

"The US will have to abandon the sledgehammer-to-crack-a-nut approach - it has failed," he said. "They need to stop viewing every Iraqi, every Arab as the enemy and attempt to win the hearts and minds of the people.

He just said they were intermingled with the "innocent civilians". I guess it is not as easy as he would like for it to appear. Maybe we should ask them to wear arm bands if they are the enemy.

"Our objective is to create a stable, democratic and safe Iraq. That's achievable but not in the short term. It is going to take up to 10 years."

Link...
 
Fresh perspective...??

Kuwaiti-based Al Sistani aide condemns kidnappings

Reuters
Kuwait: A Kuwait-based aide to Iraq's top Shiite religious leader, Ayatollah Ali Al Sistani, denounced the kidnapping of three Japanese citizens as a "terrorist" act and demanded their immediate release.

A hitherto unknown group in Iraq on Thursday released a video showing what it said were three Japanese hostages including a woman, blindfolded and with a gun to their heads, and vowed to "burn them alive" if Japanese troops did not leave Iraq within three days.

"We demand those kidnappers to set them free immediately for the sake of Iraq's interests. Islam is free of such terrorist acts and the use of violence, especially against women," Ayatollah Mohammed Baqer Al Mohri said in Friday sermon remarks, carried by newspapers on Saturday.

"This ugly picture hurts Islam and Muslims as it gives a bad impression about our Islamic religion."

Al Mohri also denounced what he called the chaos in Iraq caused by the followers of outlawed Shi ite cleric Moqtada Al Sadr.

"We condemn the acts of sabotage, chaos and takeover of public property by a group that unfortunately is part of one of Iraq's biggest and best known families," Al Mohri said.

"The theological and national positions and the position of most Shi'ites in Iraq is that of Imam Sistani," Al Mohri said.

"Let the Islamic nation and the United States of America know that this is the official position of Iraq's Shiites, even all the Shi'ites in the world".
Link...
 
Islam Group Honors 9/11 Hijackers

LONDON, Sept. 11, 2003

(CBS) The group that calls itself al Muhajiroun and claims to be the eyes and ears of militant Islam, held a very different 9/11 commemoration Thursday, reports CBS News Correspondent Mark Phillips.

This remembrance was not filled with grief and tears but with a perverse sense of pride. Today they honored not those who were murdered, but those who killed them.

"They revived the obligation of jihad worldwide. 19 Brave warriors, mujahedeen who made the ultimate sacrifice,'' said a speaker at a London rally, referring to the 19 9/ll hijackers.

On its Web site, the 9/11 hijackers are revered as "the magnificent nineteen."

...

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/09/11/eveningnews/main572811.shtml

Is this part of the anonymous British officer's "The British response in Iraq has been much softer." approach to "attempt to win the hearts and minds of the people"??

"no formal complaints have as yet been made to their American counterparts" but I just want to whine to the media a little...Ok?
 
Charley Reese is often on the side of the angels, but he has an unfortunate soft spot in his heart, and also in his head, for Arabs.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top