To those out there who believe people other than retail outlets are setting the "fair market price" or whatever you wish to call it, frankly you are full of it. You may also decide just what "it" is.
Furthermore this madness does not effect me at all, most if not all of my ammo was purchased long before anyone even heard of an Obama for Senate.
To those out there who believe people other than retail outlets are setting the "fair market price" or whatever you wish to call it, frankly you are full of it. You may also decide just what "it" is.
General Jackson made the Treaty of Ghent a rather moot point,
Now let me get this straight. Keeping in mind that Walmart has a 3 box limit, you think that instead of selling to 4 guys/gals at 7am and instead sell it to 4 different guys/gals at 2pm is going to solve the shortage. Did you hit your head on something. What you and others need to understand is that noone is getting anywhere near what they got in 2012 before this mess started. Every shop owner and big box retailer manager has told me this.Once all Walmarts take that practice of putting stock out randomly, .22 ammo will drop in price dramatically. With scalpers having first dibs at 7 in the morning,
making ammo drops random removes their profit(time = money) and we all win. No reason to buy .22 at double and triple the norm when it's readily available at Walmart.
It's really amazing, and sad, the impact Walmart has over our lives.
What supply.All these outlandish profits being made by those in the so called "free Market" being reported as income?
So Sam, in your mind the largest retail company in the world has no idea what the "market value" is and therefore they are in fact "full of it".
Plain and simple its nothing short of greed on the part of those who participate in scalping the supply.
Almost slipped by, almost. Attacking me personally does not cancel out my opinion.Did you hit your head on something.
There is no shortage of anything. Just many people gobbling ammo up and sitting on it either til this all blows over(again) and the few snatching it up only to resell at scalping prices. If Walmart sets a one box limit and those boxes were spread onto 20-30 people instead of the 4 or 5 in the morning, yes it would alleviate much of this. First of all those 4 in the morning are all together sometimes which equals one shopper with family/friends getting their limits. So one or a few people have all that days supply which means they can demand from those possible 20-30 others who missed out whatever price they deem fit in online auctions or gunshows, hence over priced .22 ammo which we are all dealing with.you think that instead of selling to 4 guys/gals at 7am and instead sell it to 4 different guys/gals at 2pm is going to solve the shortage.
I will not buy ammo at scalper prices so hopefully the "tax free illegal ammo entrepreneurs" have to eat that ammo when prices correct themselves.
Not on the point. An interesting question, but not directly related to what we're discussing. I mean, after all, we're all such big proponents of the current tax code that we're going to be the enthusiastic rah-rah team for the tax man? You'll never see a bunch of individualists screaming for tax law enforcement like you will when someone else stands to make a buck.All these outlandish profits being made by those in the so called "free Market" being reported as income?
Now let's be perfectly clear! I'M the only one that's "Full of It," thankyouverymuch!So Sam, in your mind the largest retail company in the world has no idea what the "market value" is and therefore they are in fact "full of it".
Buying something for one price and selling it again at a much higher price will always be called greed by someone. Others will call it "making a living" or "wise investment" or some other term. If the point of the exercise is to turn a profit and therefore continue to meet life's expenses and maybe get ahead, then "greed" is absolutely fine, positive, and necessary.Plain and simple its nothing short of greed on the part of those who participate in scalping the supply.
Exactly my point. The fact that you haven't bought ammo in decades doesn't make your opinion more valid. You aren't participating in the current market at all, but you're casting stones at a lot of folks who are. Bully for you.What does that have to do with anything? So far back in history it for sure is a moot point!General Jackson made the Treaty of Ghent a rather moot point,
Exactly my point. The fact that you haven't bought ammo in decades doesn't make your opinion more valid. You aren't participating in the current market at all, but you're casting stones at a lot of folks who are. Bully for you.
Not on the point. An interesting question, but not directly related to what we're discussing. I mean, after all, we're all such big proponents of the current tax code that we're going to be the enthusiastic rah-rah team for the tax man? You'll never see a bunch of individualists screaming for tax law enforcement like you will when someone else stands to make a buck.
I see what you're saying there. I mean, wouldn't it be great if guns and ammo and places to shoot were free and totally open-access to anyone who wanted to participate?And I'm doing it for the very reason that all this greed is hurting the shooting sports in general for all the new folks getting into this sport, no matter whether they are young or old or in between.
I'm not even going to answer one way or the other. It's off topic here and not on-point to the discussion. I'm just pointing out how ironic it is that we LOVE to enforce "the law" when someone else stands to get ahead. Right champions of justice we are -- when it isn't our butts, our money, our profit.So you support breaking or ignoring the law? Way to go, very HR.Not on the point. An interesting question, but not directly related to what we're discussing. I mean, after all, we're all such big proponents of the current tax code that we're going to be the enthusiastic rah-rah team for the tax man? You'll never see a bunch of individualists screaming for tax law enforcement like you will when someone else stands to make a buck.
Oh certainly. Express your opinion! I'll continue to express mine. A nice point-counterpoint for the readers.You know Sam, its very possible you will never convince me, nor I you. But in the end I am entitled to my opinion, as are you. That is one of my entitlements, I think.
I didn't attack you personally. I attacked the supposition you put forth. You're position that changing the time ammo is put on the shelf for sale will correct the shortage is simply crazy. You ignore the basic fact that there is very little supply available for purchase. You missed that. You simply chose to ignore the increased number of new gun owners which is in the neighborhood of 20 million new gun owners. Plus those gun owners that expanded their own personal collection into new areas. That is the crux of the problem.Almost slipped by, almost. Attacking me personally does not cancel out my opinion.
There is no shortage of anything. Just many people gobbling ammo up and sitting on it either til this all blows over(again) and the few snatching it up only to resell at scalping prices. If Walmart sets a one box limit and those boxes were spread onto 20-30 people instead of the 4 or 5 in the morning, yes it would alleviate much of this. First of all those 4 in the morning are all together sometimes which equals one shopper with family/friends getting their limits. So one or a few people have all that days supply which means they can demand from those possible 20-30 others who missed out whatever price they deem fit in online auctions or gunshows, hence over priced .22 ammo which we are all dealing with.
I just want a box or two to shoot that day and the early bird scalpers in Walmart make that impossible. I will not buy ammo at scalper prices so hopefully the "tax free illegal ammo entrepreneurs" have to eat that ammo when prices correct themselves.
Sam in my area the limits imposed by sellers are the maximum. The folks at Academy have informed me they could lose their job if they are caught putting ammo away for themselves after they get off work. In fact several of their managers have been in line on their day off to purchase ammo. That's just my area.Additionally: I sometimes wonder if WalMart's "3-box" limit is really a maximum, or a minimum?
I know a lot of buyers would have spent thousands and bought the entire shipment before it was off the truck last year if they were allowed to, but I seriously believe that there's some slick psychology going on with a "3 box limit" imposed on the shopper.
Someone walks into the store and says, "Hmmm...I'll grab some ammo if they have any." They might pick up one or two...or five. Who knows? But if you tell them "there's a panic on! I can't sell you more than THREE BOXES!!!"
Guess how many boxes 99% of customers will walk out with?
I wonder if it is possible to do some kind of analysis and figure out if they sold more or less with a 3-box limit in place?