rellascout
member
It is my legal right until my government strips me of it.
You have no legal right to carry a gun on someone else's private property.
It is my legal right until my government strips me of it.
You do. I posted this before as a response to the exact thing you are claiming again...I'll elaborate:You have no legal right to carry a gun on someone else's private property.
I do, until told otherwise. I will obey and all federal and state laws until notified on your property that you have a more refined set of laws that I must abide if I wish to stay. This is the EXACT way things are handled in businesses and residences...no different.
The 2A(federal) and my carry license(state supplied) sets the president until you tell me I cannot carry on your property.
Those rights cease to exist, on your property, should you ask me to remove the firearm or myself.
Until such notification by the property owner, I am perfectly within my rights (and the state and federal laws) to carry my firearm on the property.
You may prohibit items or people of your choosing, your property. The person does not have to be granted permission to carry a firearm on your property, they are legally allowed to do so unless notified otherwise through words or signage (laws vary on proper signage and their weight of laws in different states).
I believe there are only a couple states(Arkansas is one) that require notification. If it is in the state law, then yes you are required to notify.I could be wrong but doesn't this vary from state to state? My statement might have been too broad. So in this case we are both wrong in that we are applying a something which is subjective and applying it universally.
Some states require disclosure so it negates what you are saying here. You must disclose and then be granted permission to carry. No notification necessary. The armed person entering the property is the one who is legally bound to notify.
I don't have stupid friends.
You have an odd definition of armed. The loaded but locked gun is completely incapable of firing. I don't think any of us here in possession of such an object would consider ourselves armed, any more than we would be while holding a paperweight.On the 2 question that Neverwinter asked; it is unlikely that I would allow someone with a Steyr M-series pistol that was locked and unloaded and the key not in their posession into my home armed. It makes me think that the person lacks confidence in their own abilities to handle a firearm and raises a red flag.
I think this is an important post (thanks, gamestalker).Daughter tried for a good 10 minutes to get him to calm down enough to hear what she was saying, without any sucess what so ever. He was yelling that I must be crazy to expose my Daughter, and Grand Daughter to a gun.
You have an odd definition of armed. The loaded but locked gun is completely incapable of firing.
More like something is assumed to be okay unless otherwise specified. If a person wasn't provided sufficient information to know if they should disclose, it isn't their fault for not doing so. People aren't telepathic.So, I guess we can sum it all up as "anything is okay as as long as you don't get caught."
The people who carry LEGALLY, open or otherwise, are the least of your concerns as they have been checked out to be given their permit-to-carry.
L. Neil Smith said:Wear a gun to someone else's house, you're saying, 'I'll defend this home as if it were my own.' When your guests see you carry a weapon, you're telling them, 'I'll defend you as if you were my own family.' And anyone who objects levels the deadliest insult possible: 'I don't trust you unless you're rendered harmless'!