Concealed carry at a gun show?

Status
Not open for further replies.
What compelling reason is there for you to attend a gunshow? No one is forcing you to attend. If you don't like the rules, vote with your pocketbook and don't attend the show.

You have a very good point. I could choose not to attend. I don't choose to do that. I'm not legally required to. That's a compromise about which I have to decide for myself. A weighty one, not undertaken lightly, but one that I am comfortable with.

A show promoter is running a business. A business that requires specialized insurance that, if he doesn't have or can't afford, without such - there is no show.

Loaded weapons in his venue have the potential of jeopardizing his business. He has the right to do business, he has a right to expect you to respect his rules. When you buy a ticket to his event, you have entered into a contract with the promoter to respect his rules on the private property he has rented.

The same point can be made about thousands of venues, gun-realated and not. I could choose to aviod them all, or go about my business secure in my own gun handling (Ha Ha! Or, "gun-NOT-handling" as the case may be :D) and my position in regards to the law.

When a promoter leases convention space - he becomes the property owner for the duration of his lease. He is liable for what takes place on that property. You do not have a right to jeopardize the event. You do not have a right to decide what you can and cannot do on someone else's property.

I will admit that I don't know the ins-and-outs of property ownership transfer and liability under a lease agreement such as this. I won't argue about that point.

For the second statement, according to the law of my state, I DO have the legal standing to make the choice I make. Period.

My private defensive weapon does not jeopardize the event. You may believe with all your heart that it does, but that doesn't change the fact. Your beliefs about the threat my holstered, concealed gun poses to the attendees and promotors of the gun show doesn't change the law in my jurisdiction, either. So please don't continue to tell me what "rights" I do or don't have.

If the rules don't apply to everyone then they are worthless. I'm 100% certain that every accidental discharge that ever occurred at a gun show was caused by a person who figured the rules didn't apply to him.
Yes. They screwed up big time. They pay a hefty penalty, commensurate with the damage they cause through their negligence -- as they would in any location where such negligence threatened and/or injured another.

I haven't, I don't, I won't. The gun in my holster threatens his liability not at all. Regardless, I don't give up my ability to defend myself and my love ones if the law does not require me to do so.

The rules apply to me. I accept that. I may not follow them, if I am not legally required to do so, but I am not claiming to be exempt from them, either. I accept the penalties as well. If I am seen to violate them, I accept being shown to the door. If I loose my mind temporarily, draw my weapon, and shoot a hole through the promotor's hat, I'll have to take the penalties for that one, too.

It isn't a perfect system. But it works. It works for me (who chooses to go armed) and it works for you (who chooses to go unarmed). It gives the promotor the leverage he needs to maintain safety as he sees fit. There is no conflict.

-Sam
 
Sam, I don't see how you are able to logically argue that a loaded handgun in a holster is OK, but a loaded rifle slung over your shoulder is not?

What if someone's only self defense weapon is a rifle? You are saying that you have a right to defend yourself, but so does the guy who only owns a rifle.
 
Sam, I don't see how you are able to logically argue that a loaded handgun in a holster is OK, but a loaded rifle slung over your shoulder is not?
To me, either is fine. I like open carry, though I don't really do it.

In the situation of a gun show, specifically, I've agreed with you that weapons visibly out in the public space, as an OC pistol or a carried rifle would be, are significantly more likely to end up set down, handled, etc. than a concealed, private sidearm. So I understand why they would be prohibited in a gun show. I argued the legitimacy of that rule, myself. Several times. And also argued that it is and should be enforced at shooting competitions / ranges / gun shops, etc. as well.

Again, what's in my holster, out of public view and access, and only to be retrieved in the moment of greatest need, is no one's business but mine. If I screw up and bring it to anyone's attention through whatever dumb act, I'm out on my arse.

Works for me. If someone else draws their loaded carry weapon next to me, I want them out on their arse, as well.

Is that somehow unclear?

What if someone's only self defense weapon is a rifle? You are saying that you have a right to defend yourself, but so does the guy who only owns a rifle.

I'm not telling him that he can't defend himself. I would suggest that he can't carry it past the gate guards without meeting the definition for trespassing in my state. I can't be responsible for what a hypothetical person chooses to own or not own. :confused:

-Sam
 
These comments about breaking the rules until you get caught are downright childish.
Blindly following the wishes of others without regard to the real and practical implications of your actions is what I would consider childish. Learn to think on your own.

what's in my holster, out of public view and access, and only to be retrieved in the moment of greatest need, is no one's business but mine
QFT
 
That sucks. Gun shows are supposed to be full of the most pro gun people and yet they ban guns. IRONY!!

They ban guns because there's too darn many squirrels out there who do stupid things with guns. In our litigious society, Billy Boogerhook's negligent trigger pull and subsequent "BANG" might result in the closure of the entire show.

FWIW, if you're REALLY serious about keeping it holstered no matter what, you can almost always just keep quiet and mind your Ps & Qs.

Over at the Indy 1500, they have the "no guns" signs yet they still have a ND almost every year (sometimes more than one). I think the latest one was some doofus who dropped his loaded gun when he was loading up and reholstering upon leaving (which, frankly is where I'm most fearful at the Indy show). Gun went "BANG" and shot the owner. Unfortunate, but it was purely negligence and sloppy gun handling.

Oh, and last time I was at Indy, we were supposed to not have any loaded mags.

John
 
But Sam, maybe he attended the gun show to sell the rifle and buy himself a J-frame, so as to be more concealably armed...

In that case the rifle is DEFINEITLY going to be handled and shouldn't be loaded
 
If I screw up...
You potentially screw it up for everyone who likes going to gun shows.

And if I (or you) screw up at the mall or in the park I (or you) potentially screw it up for all who want to carry a concealed weapon in a public place.

We all risk a lot -- including social and governmental censure of our "gunnie" brethren and their activities -- every time we TOUCH a gun, let alone load one, carry one, or shoot one.

There are risks in all things. We learn the best skills we can, practice to maintain them, endeavor to remain vigilant and cautious at all times...and then we step out in the world and take our chances.

I trust you with the choices you make. You (have no choice but to) trust me with those I make.

-Sam
 
At the extreme risk of winding up the debate again :cuss: I had a minor dim flash of insight that might help nail this one down:

Say there will be approximately 25,000 visitors per day to an average gun show around here. (I'm going to be making the numbers up based on perceptions and estimates of my own. Exact numbers are not that important to my point.) Two days (not counting Friday night) means 50,000 bodies in and through over the course of the maybe 20 hours total that the show is open.

In PA, I'd guess that about 1/3 to 1/2 will be carrying a concealed weapon. (That might seem high, but across PA's entire population around 7% hold a LTCF for better than 650,000 CCW folks statewide. I think that number would be a LOT higher among gun show attendees.) So let's say it's 1/3 of the 50K. That's over 16,000 who might carry through those doors.

Now we've all heard, and I'm sure no-one would debate, the old mantra that a holstered gun is a safe gun. The only time folks have negligent discharges is when the gun comes OUT of the holster. The most dangerous point in your carrying day is when you load or unload. That's true if you have mad skills, and true if you are a newbie, and true if you're too old to rack a slide -- everyone is at their least safe when loading and unloading.

BUT, the sign at the door says "no loaded firearms." What do you have these folks do? Surely the ticket takers are NOT staffed or equipped to handle safely unloading and clearing 16,000 concealed firearms. I've never seen a sand barrel/bullet-trap at the door. Without means to contain negligent discharges while unloading, the promoters would be practically FORCING frequent instances of property damage, injury, and even an occasional death were they to set themselves up as responsible for such processing.

So, where are all these good folks to go to unload? 16,000 folks facing in any number of directions more or less randomly drawing and unloading their carry weapon amongst the cars in a couple of acres of parking lot seems a nightmarish situation. And guess what? If the gun show promoter is liable (as the temporary property owner, as it has been presented) for what goes on inside, then he/she is just as liable for the "attractive nuisance" (why do I always think of J-Lo when I use that term? :eek:) he/she's created just outside those doors. The ND in the parking lot that kills someone getting out of their car is just as much his/her problem as the one inside that killed Bubba Jerky (in our previous adventures on page 3). Even if there is a minutely reduced level of true liability for what happens out there, it isn't enough to matter. A dead gun show attendee or two in the parking lot of a venue has just the same social impact that the same number of perforated folks inside will have.

The difference is, instead of being a somewhat passive player as 50,000 folks shuffle through -- some probably armed, but not causing a problem, the promoter is now responsible for encouraging 16,000 folks to go play with their guns in the parking lot.

And that's not to even start to discuss the rampant firearm theft this would attract once word gets out that there will be at least one firearm left in 1 out of every 3 cars in that one lot!

Now, surely, no one would be so naive as to suggest or believe that all those folks would leave their carry weapons back at home. That would pretty much go contrary to the very principles we espouse here on THR. And, as several folks have said, it's not like all gun show venues are in fantastic gated communities where crime is a distant worry.

So, the smart folks who handle risk management issues like this have developed a perfect solution:

"Tell everyone entering to unload all weapons. That will give someone a chance to verify one last time that the for-sale and for-trade guns coming in the door have been emptied, and lets them zip-tie the actions open to give everyone a quick visual verification.
But, DON'T put them through a metal detector or wand them! We can't open ourselves up to the liability of handling, or forcing them to handle/clear their weapons in the ticket line, NOR do we want to push all the CCW folks back out into that parking lot to unload under whatever conditions they can figure out for themselves. FAR, FAR better to let sleeping dogs lie. 99.9% of the guns carried in as private, defensive arms will be carried back out the same way, without causing a mote of risk or trouble.
And, yes, if a fellow or two forgets himself and draws his carry gun, we have a reasonable and predetermined method and justification for correcting his mistake and sending him on his way.
"

This IS how it is done. If the promoters and insurance companies wanted it to work some other way, they'd have it set up to work THAT way.

Knowing that this is how the system works, and that it is not "the golden path to heaven" or a moral high road of some sort, goes a long way toward understanding why so many of us make the choices we do.

-Sam
 
You potentially screw it up for everyone who likes going to gun shows.

Restricting something based on what could potentially happen is what the Brady Bunch wants to do. I'd prefer to judge something by what is actually likely to happen based on past events and an application of logic. What is likely to happen with my concealed weapon which WILL stay concealed is...absolutely nothing.
 
Over at the Indy 1500, they have the "no guns" signs yet they still have a ND almost every year (sometimes more than one).

And that is the crux of the whole thing, isn't it? The dumb twit who is likely to whip out his loaded piece at a gunshow and commit an ND is also the same dumb twit who is going to ignore the rule/law in the first place.

But the converse is not true, typically. Not all people (such as Sam or other fellows I know well) who choose to ignore the rule (or law in my state) are careless, wreckless idiots, an ND looking for a gunshow to happen. Heck, some of the more careful guys I know who carry regularly due so EVERYWHERE metal detectors aren't present, regardless of what the rules/laws state. I know of one who regularly carries on educational property, state buildings and DoD installations. Yes, in the case of LAWS, the implications are pretty freakin' severe, so I certainly do not condone the practice. But as I said, the gentleman in question is quite aware of the risks he is taking, and takes it very seriously.

The bottom line is that in the excitement of a gun show, people forget what they are doing and make dumb mistakes with gun handling. It is therefore better just to keep all the guns unloaded.

I most certainly do not forget what I'm doing a make dumb mistakes with gun handling out in public, because we just don't handle them, and neither do others I know. In fact, when at a gunshow I am always squeamish about handling guns, unloaded and tied as they may be, because it is extremely difficult avoid pointing the muzzle in an unsafe direction. Always bothers me, always will. Gives me the willies.

I'm not directing the folllowing statement at anyone here, so please don't take it that way. I do wonder if there might be a bit of "projection" going on with those opposed to CCW at a gunshow, even when state law permits such. Person A assumes that since person A would forget him/herself and pull out their CCW for show-and-tell, then Persons B, C, D, E ... would do the same. Believe it or not, but whipping out my concealed weapon in any place other than my own home or car (unless facing the gravest extreme of course, as Sam puts it) is as alien and unthinkable to me as whipping out certain parts of my anatomy. :D
 
Last edited:
I have to agree with those who have noted the hypocrisy in the "No Guns" policy at gun shows. I'm sure at some point the Brady Campaign, ABC, or God-knows-who will get hold of this and portray it as the ultimate proof that guns are dangerous and must be controlled.

And you know what? It will give them a winning argument.
 
Believe it or not, but whipping out my concealed weapon in any place other than my own home or car (unless facing the gravest extreme of course, as Sam puts it) is as alien and unthinkable to me as whipping out certain parts of my anatomy.
Exactly. It would literally feel like undressing in public. NOT EVER EVER EVER going to happen by accident, that's for sure.
 
Sam; being you were nice enough to "CORRECT" my quote; let me "Re-Correct" your quote:

You have three choices; 1)Comply or 2)Don't go in or 3)Disrespect the Property owner's wishes/RIGHTS; whether it's a friend, neighbor, local business, gun show property owner, etc... EVEN THOUGH I am demanding that they RESPECT my wishes/RIGHTS.

I think I got it now. When I started this thread, it was because I don't recall ever seeing a sign that specifically mentioned concealed weapons. It seems that when they mention no LOADED weapons, that implies "Concealed Carry Weapons" also. I will definitely look closer at the sign this weekend at the gun show I'm going to.

But I don't think it's important whether we debate if it's safe or unsafe to have concealed and loaded weapons at a gun show. I just can not for the life of me understand how some people can be so passionate about THEIR RIGHTS; yet they have absolutely no respect whatsoever for the RIGHTS of the property owner who is leasing/renting/etc... space for a gun show promoter to have a gun show; and NO MATTER WHAT THE REASON IS; this property owner has said "Assuming it is posted" (NO LOADED WEAPONS). And yet there are some here who are such Hypocrites to not respect that Property Owner's RIGHTS while demanding their own RIGHTS be observed. Most here have already admitted that if a neighbor/relative asked you to NOT carry in their house, that you would either NOT carry or WOULDN'T go to their house. I assume the same for a friend or neighbor. What about the local Pawn Shop, Auto Parts Store, Burger King, etc... "If they had a sign in the Window saying NO FIREARMS, CONCEALED OR OPEN ALLOWED ON THESE PREMISES; would you choose options 1) and 2) of abiding or Not entering that establishment? Or would you also choose option 3) Do it anyway and not let them know? Thereby totally Disrespecting THEIR PROPERTY RIGHTS??? This is numerous similar responses; not picking on Sam.

It is this mentality and hypocrisy that gives a bad name and stereotype of gun owners to the Anti-Gun crowd. Keeps going back to the "WHY do you have a gun" question. Some people just can't say it's because they like them, want them, enjoy shooting, hunting, self defense, etc... No.... They have to throw the... "IT'S MY RIGHT" speech in the faces of others. And yet it appears some people just don't respect others. I am definitely confused by such an attitude. I definitely believe that others should RESPECT MY RIGHTS. Including my right to "Keep and Bear Arms". But when I am on THEIR PROPERTY; and yes, the gun shows are either on PRIVATE property or GOVERNMENT property such as Fair Grounds, etc... Either way, there is a PROPERTY OWNER. If that property owner has a sign saying NO LOADED FIREARMS; (Doesn't matter WHY the sign is there); then if you choose to enter, you choose to respect their rights to have such a rule. If you don't like it, don't go. And DEFINITELY, don't talk to me about YOUR RIGHTS. The minute you disrespect other's rights; YOUR RIGHTS mean absolutely nothing.
 
I'm surprised that no one has yet raised the question of whether the property owner is responsible for protecting you should he demand you go unarmed? While I've already outlined my position and would never abdicate my responsibility to protect myself, I wonder what those of you who would will say if you are injured or killed (ok, if you're killed, you won't be saying anything - but perhaps your estate?) at an event where you were not legally required to disarm, but you did it anyway at the request of the property owner.

The insurance companies want to say "no loaded guns" so they are not on the hook when somebody shoots up the place. Let's say that one more time so that everybody understands why public events may sometimes exclude what would otherwise be a legal right to carry. The insurance companies want to say "no loaded guns" so they are not on the hook when somebody shoots up the place.

Does this mean the insurance doesn't pay out if somebody has a loaded gun? Or the premium of the insured goes up? No. It means one thing and one thing only - and it has nothing to do with the fact that an actuary has determined that "some risk is mitigated" by the fact that some people will give up their guns. It means that the promoter cannot be sued for negligence by "permitting" (gasp!) loaded firearms at the event. Do we even need to go into the discussion around how whacked juries in America can be?

The reality is that the promoter is asking you to go unarmed to ensure that his risk of exposure when (when, not if) there is a shooting, he cannot later be blamed for negligent behavior. And of course the insurance companies are telling him that he must do this if he wants coverage. Not inexpensive coverage (there is no coverage offered for such risky behavior as actually having a loaded gun!), but coverage.

Since this is really about reducing the financial exposure of the promoter, doesn't it make sense to ask what type of guarantee that he'll offer to ensure you are not injured at his event? Of course the promoter has no duty to protect you. He's already taken the very reasonable steps of asking everyone else to leave their guns at home. How could he know that an accident would happen? Or that somebody was carrying and decided to go whacko? He has no duty to protect you.

Tell me again about that respect part? Who's going to protect me in the unlikely (hopefully) event that I need it? Like my mama always said, nobody looks out for you more than yourself.

:D
 
I've been to four gun shows, but they were all before I acquired a CW card. The card I have is not in the state I reside in, nor is it in MA, (unfortunately I could have used one there to defend a transport case, see other thread.....) but now that I have a card my personal opinion is this. And again, its only my opinion, and is not meant to tread on yours, or anyone elses.

My main reason for wanting a permit is so that I can have readily accessible protection to defend myself in the case of a crime against myself or my family. We carry large amounts of cash because of our business, and it's my desire to protect myself and my family.

At a gun show, in my opinion, it is highly unlikely that a criminal is going to show up and mug me, or my family, or try to rape my wife, or do any other thing that would warrant, "legal, lethal, self defense". If a guy wants to steal my ammo, or my gun, or my french fries, I wouldn't shoot him for that anyway. I would only shoot him if he was going to hurt someone. In a robbery, I woudln't shoot if they threatened from a distance and wanted the money, I'd throw the money and let them leave, because that is what the law says. But if they point a gun in a robbery, I'd shoot for fear that they would kill even after the money was given.

So, all that being said........... what are the chances that someone would rape you, or your wife, or mug you, or LETHALLY threaten you, at a gun show? Wouldn't that be like a mouse walking into the lion's den? So, since the most heinous crime that I could imagine happening there is the petty theft of a cool hunting scope, or even a handgun, or maybe my french fries, I think I would just opt to leave my firearm out of the picture at that event. And if I was at a gun show where I really thought a lethal crime was likely to occur, I would simply leave or not go in the first place.

I know that we carry because we NEVER KNOW when or where the threat will come, I understand that, and it's a valid point and concern. But from a calculated view, the chances of a criminal applying lethal force or harm to myself or a loved one at a gun show are almost nill. I feel safer at those places than I do the local shopping mall near my house, where the criminal public trolls about, and that is why if I had to go there I would certainly carry.

This is only a statement of my opinion, and not an intrusion on anyone else's.

-Quentin
Romans 10:13
 
In the words of Suzanna Gratia Hupp ( who watched both of her parents die because she obeyed Texas' "No carry Law" )

"I am under no obligation to follow a bad law. "

I absolutely respect the right of a home owner to dictate what is and isn't acceptable on their property.

A business that is open to the public has no right to override my right to life and the defense there of.

As a responsible gun owner I conduct my business in public daily, with no one the wiser that I am armed.

Please tell me how the mere posession of a firearm by a responsible gun owner on the premises of the Phil Long Expo Center violates the owner's property rights?

For that matter is it Phil Long's (doubtful, he's dead) policy or the policy of the Prospector's Sertoma?


Originally posted on Sept 10 2001 Oh come on people! Can anyone give a cite where someone, anyone, intentionally flew a plane into a building in NYC? Jeez, talk about paranoia!

Before Paducah who heard of people shooting up schools? Just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean it won't ever happen.


what are the chances that someone would rape you, or your wife, or mug you, or LETHALLY threaten you, at a gun show? Wouldn't that be like a mouse walking into the lion's den?

Why? Are you forgeting all the signs proclaiming the gun show a "Criminal Protection Zone"? If everyone's following the disarmament rules, who's gonna stop him?
 
Rockwell, I think you really have shown your true colors. I respect everybody's opinion; whether I agree with them or not. But you have clarified all of your past comments in one sentence:

A business that is open to the public has no right to override my right to life and the defense there of.

In this one statement, you have answered many things. You assume that because a business opens it's doors to "Customers" in the hope of profiting, that some how it has no rights. That the owner is some inanimate object and NOT a human being who ALSO has rights. Just like when a bar/tavern posts signs that says: "We reserve the RIGHT to refuse service to anyone"; so does all businesses. As long as that refusal of service is not due to personal discrimination. What about the signs that say; "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service".

Sorry, but there is absolutely no excuse for taking this position. Whether the property owner is a relative, friend, neighbor, or business establishment; they DO RESERVE THE RIGHT to set policies for patrons to conduct business on their property. As long as the policies/rules are the same for all patrons and not discriminatory against an individual person or persons; the business owner has every right in the world to set policy. You doing business there is totally by choice. Now, once you do conduct business, you have certain consumer rights. But that is a separate issue. But the property owner has complete right to set rules and policies. And the reason s/he does; is because you are NOT FORCED to do business with that property owner. You do not HAVE to go into that person's house or their business if you don't like the rules/policies they have set.

You will lose this one 100% of the time in any court of law. EVERY TIME!

This has nothing to do if a person is safe with a gun; whether gun shows run the risk of a crime; whether there's idiots at gun shows; etc... This has absolutely NOTHING to do with any of that. This has to do with respect for rights. Well; if you want your fellow citizens to respect your right to "Keep and Bear Arms"; then you MUST respect their right to "NOT Keep and Bear Arms" and to deny weapons on THEIR PROPERTY if they so choose. If you don't respect their Rights, then YOUR Rights mean absolutely NOTHING.

This also applies to speech, religion, and anything else you can think of. If I want people to RESPECT my RIGHT to religion; then I need to Respect their Right to religion; or to NO Religion at all. The hardest thing I had to do in my 21 years in the Military, where I took an oath to protect the constitution and the rights of the citizens; was the Right of FREE SPEECH. There's nothing worse than protecting a person's right to free speech when what they say makes your blood BOIL. When they are ALLOWED to tell you that you are killing innocent women and children. That you're a baby killer. But this is THEIR RIGHT to Free Speech. And I WILL RESPECT it. Even if I don't like it. And I will walk away from it if I don't like hearing it. And you must do the same thing with the 2nd amendment. When Rights are spoken of, as in: To DO, SAY, GO, etc...; that also means that a person has the Right to NOT Do, Say, Go, etc... The person who's private property; whether it's their residence or business, who chooses to NOT ALLOW weapons or any variation of on their property; is ALSO EXERCISING THEIR 2nd Amendment Right. So who are YOU to deny this person from exercising THEIR 2nd amendment right??? You either respect their rights also, or your right means absolutely nothing. And that is how our Rights will be taken away from us. When NEITHER side respects the other side's RIGHTS. The Right to "Keep and Bear Arms" also means the Right "NOT to Keep and Bear Arms".
 
Every gun show I've ever been to had at least a half a dozen cops on the premises and several more in the parking lot.
__________________

So did New Life Church when Matthew Murray started shooting, he was dead before the police in the parking lot of the church got the first dispatch from 911

Sorry, but there is absolutely no excuse for taking this position

I don't recall asking your permission to take this position. Your rights as a property owner end where they infringe my right to life (and the defense there of) and liberty.

I've made this statement in all of my posts in this thread and I haven’t heard a single actual argument yet against it. To paraphrase Ted Nugent, I don't need a document to explain to me that I have the right to defend my life. That right exists independent of the 2nd amendment or any law of the land it is an inalienable right Inalienable means “ can not be transferred to another” (American Heritage Dictionary) that means that you can’t take it away.

Virginia Tech, Luby’s Cafeteria and Northern Illinois University have all provided convincing proof of what happens when a citizen surrenders his rights to the state or (in the case of Vtech) a private entity.

If I enter your place of business with my sidearm it will remain in its holster on my hip unless needed. My mere possession of a firearm does not infringe on your right to life or liberty, I t will not affect your ability to make money that day, and It will not drive your customers away (I never advocated the open display of a firearm in a Criminal Protection Zone).

The rule (and any such like it) is illogical because the criminals aren’t going to follow it anyway. What do you supposed would have happen if one of Cho Sung Hui’s teachers had jumped in front of him and said “ Now Cho, you know there’s a school rule against bringing guns to class.” Do you think he’d have said ‘OOPS s I forgot. “ And put the gun down?

I’m haven’t put anything in this post that wasn’t in the others and I’m tired of going around and around this mountain so I’m going to end this here. If you really want to defend your position tell me why your rights as a property owner override my right to defend my life.
 
Last edited:
I think I got it now
Ooops! Lost it again...

Whether or not you feel I'm "disrespecting" the property owner's wishes simply doesn't enter into it. My rights end at his nose, his end at my nose. (See below.)

And, don't use the construct "wishes/RIGHTS." That implies that the two are equal when they are not. There's a thread someone started elsewhere that is trying to grind through the definition of "RIGHTS" -- but none of the definitions being floated include "wishes."

And yet there are some here who are such Hypocrites to not respect that Property Owner's RIGHTS while demanding their own RIGHTS be observed.

This one's pretty easy, and has already been covered.

What I'm carrying concealed about my person as a personal defensive weapon has no bearing on the exercise of someone else's rights. Your rights stop at my nose, and vice versa. Keep your nose out of my pants and we have in no way offended each other or denied each other's rights.

My personal weapon, out of sight, privately held, not brought into view/action in any way, is not any concern of anyone besides me.

It looks like your developing views on rights do not agree with mine, but that's ok. We can agree to disagree on this if you like.

-Sam
 
Last edited:
what are the chances that someone would rape you, or your wife, or mug you, or LETHALLY threaten you, at a gun show?
What are the chances that someone would do those things anywhere? Pretty slim, in almost all situations. But you (I) don't get to pick.

Wouldn't that be like a mouse walking into the lion's den?
Not to any degree that would say it couldn't happen. And it isn't simply a matter of standing in the center of the gun show and saying, "I'm safe here!" As has been said, parking lots, bad neighborhoods, bathrooms, alleys, etc., abound and there is no provision for a place to unload and show clear at any gun show I've been to. So we're left with thousands of folks playing with their guns in a parking lot -- and then LEAVING several THOUSAND unattended guns in that parking lot while they go inside.

This thread doesn't hinge on the "practical" nuts and bolts of how it all works, but when you get down to brass tacks as it were, your argument falls apart...fast.

So, since the most heinous crime that I could imagine happening there is the petty theft of a cool hunting scope, or even a handgun, or maybe my french fries,
That's a pretty narrow view of what *could* happen, and I'm not ready to fall down on my face in the hopes that a robber is going to leave a witness. That's not what we preach here at THR.

I think I would just opt to leave my firearm out of the picture at that event. And if I was at a gun show where I really thought a lethal crime was likely to occur, I would simply leave or not go in the first place.
Yes. That's nice. Let's all try to avoid any places where we THINK a lethal crime is likely to occurr.
Maybe the real problem is all those folks who decided to show up at their "lethal crime" appointments. If those folks would have simply decided not to go to that lethal crime place at that lethal crime time, we wouldn't have so much lethal crime, now would we? :scrutiny:

Leave your gun home when you like. Please don't attempt to assess when *I* should.

-Sam
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top