JustsayMo
Member
Will the 30-30 work for Black Bear? Short answer, Yes.
Long answer: I've seen Bears hit with arrows, 45-70, 30-06 and 7.62x39. All did the job when the shot was in the right spot. Bears are tough critters and I always expect some trailing to be required. The second fastest bear kill I've ever witnessed was with an arrow. The dude didn't go 10 yards before expiring. Good hits with moderate (under 1500fps) velocity 45-70 loads are nothing short of devastating. The bear I saw hit with 7.62x39 took off like it wasn't hit but piled up after sprinting a few hundred yards. The hit was a little high and the angle wasn't ideal. It did the job and that is what the shooter intended to prove. I believe the 30-30 would have performed better because most ammunition is better designed for hunting.
I've also witnessed some bad hits :banghead: taken by guys that don't practice enough to be proficient or were impatient. I try to avoid hunting with these types but my screening process isn't perfect. I had the misfortune of hunting with one of these types earlier this fall. The shot itself was not that difficult but the recovery part was questionable at best. I was NOT a happy camper looking for a bear in thick cover with night approaching. He had enough gun, he didn't execute the shot.
My point is that caliber matters less than shot placement.
We owe it to our quarry to be proficient with our weapons and to take ethical shots that maximize the probability of a quick kill and recovery.
rant over.
Long answer: I've seen Bears hit with arrows, 45-70, 30-06 and 7.62x39. All did the job when the shot was in the right spot. Bears are tough critters and I always expect some trailing to be required. The second fastest bear kill I've ever witnessed was with an arrow. The dude didn't go 10 yards before expiring. Good hits with moderate (under 1500fps) velocity 45-70 loads are nothing short of devastating. The bear I saw hit with 7.62x39 took off like it wasn't hit but piled up after sprinting a few hundred yards. The hit was a little high and the angle wasn't ideal. It did the job and that is what the shooter intended to prove. I believe the 30-30 would have performed better because most ammunition is better designed for hunting.
I've also witnessed some bad hits :banghead: taken by guys that don't practice enough to be proficient or were impatient. I try to avoid hunting with these types but my screening process isn't perfect. I had the misfortune of hunting with one of these types earlier this fall. The shot itself was not that difficult but the recovery part was questionable at best. I was NOT a happy camper looking for a bear in thick cover with night approaching. He had enough gun, he didn't execute the shot.
My point is that caliber matters less than shot placement.
We owe it to our quarry to be proficient with our weapons and to take ethical shots that maximize the probability of a quick kill and recovery.
rant over.
Last edited: