Bartholomew Roberts
Member
3.) Stopping Power, Capacity, Accuracy, … are all related to me. In most cases when a gun is fired (About 20% of the time a gun is pulled, from what I read about 75% are single shot, 15% two shots, and 5% are 3 shots. Correct me if I am wrong.) If I can put 2-3 shots center of mass from a CCW draw at a decent range all the time, even if the gun only holds 5 rounds, “in most cases”, that will do. That said, from what I read, most CCW guns can hold an extended clip that I can carry elsewhere, that will hold even more rounds.
The scenario you describe above assumes a 100% hit rate in a very stressful situation. By contrast, police officers in cities like LA and NYC average 27-33% hit rates. Your scenario also assumes a single attacker; but multiple attackers are not uncommon (IIRC, 2 attackers is actually the most common assault/robbery scenario in the UCRs).
The single biggest factor in "stopping power" is shot placement. Shot placement consists of two factors - putting the bullet where it can strike the major vital areas and having a bullet that penetrates well enough to continue deep enough without deflection. The FBI recommends a bullet that penetrates 12-18" of ballistic gel. Any bullet that meets the FBI criteria is going to penetrate several drywall-style interior walls if you miss completely.
4.) I live near Phoenix. 118 degrees is hot. You are going to sweat. Sweat and metal parts are not a good combination.
Honestly, I've carried pistols from Florida to Texas along the Gulf. I've even swam with them. The modern anti-corrosion coatings are nothing short of amazing. I know there are some odd people out there with really corrosive sweat; but the Melonite-type coatings, polymer coatings, nickel boron coatings - they really are impossible to screw up with even a casual level of attention or maintenance.
5.) Penetration – Two issues, … stopping the assailant, and stopping the assailant but putting others in danger because the bullets have continued their merry way through the assailant and are exiting on their own flight plan, possibly into bystanders.
I'll just reiterate the FBI criteria 12-18" in ballistics gel (after any intermediate barriers). Over 18" and you are more likely to see shoot-throughs. Less than 12" and you have a round that is limited to certain angles in order to have a good chance of success.
CCW is also different from home defense. I would like to have a couple of guns, that my wife is also comfortable with, and is willing to fire a large number of rounds through, in different locations around the home. We live in an apartment. Easy to shoot through walls, … I have 12 and 20 gauge shotguns, but they aren’t easily accessible … a gun you can’t get to, load, and use, when you need it, in time, is worthless. A gun that endangers innocents, is worse than worthless. A gun that will not eliminate the threat in 1-2 well placed shots, … is worthless, …
I think you have an unrealistic expectation of how effective handguns are. Strictly speaking, if you don't hit the upper central nervous system, even a shot straight through the heart leaves an attacker with the ability (though maybe not the desire) to stay in the fight 12-15 seconds. That can be a long time if they are shooting at you. You must also consider that in a fight for your life, pumped full of adrenaline, your ability to recognize the target is not a threat may lag enough that you fire 1-3 rounds even after the threat is reduced.
There was a shooting with an off-duty police officer where he fired 11 rounds at an armed robber and scored 11 hits; several of which were effective. However, it took long enough for the robber to actually drop that when his slide locked back on his Glock 26, he thought he had a failure to stop. Something to think about.
Last edited: