P5 Guy
Member
Am I the only one that longs for the days when Gangsters wore pin-striped suits and fedoras?
They kept letting guys off for lack of evidence.Years ago, there used to be laws on the books about "indecent exposure".
Funny but,my local DRUG STORE has the same sign on the front door.There was another thread about not jumping into fights that aren't yours and this is along the same lines.
I was at a LGS today that I frequent that has signs all over the entrance about not wearing hoodies and having your pants around your waste so that you're not having to constantly pull them up. I dont think I need to expand on why any retail store might, and do have these signs.
While I'm at the gun counter browsing, in walks a young black fellow with his hoodie over his head and pants around his thighs. Right off the bat someone behind the counter tells him to remove the "hood" part of his hoodie. A couple minutes later another guy behind the counter ask's him to pull up his pants. At this point there are several patrons watching and this young man decides to throw a small fit talking about racism and how the store doesnt want any black people in there.
As much as it would've been nice to grab this kid and show him the signs at the front of the store, explain to him why they were there and how there were at least 2-3 other black folks in there shopping without issue, nobody did. Certainly not me or any of the other armed folks working the store.
The kid had his rant and left and some patrons and store folks had a chat after the fact.
Point is, putting yourself in a situation which could escalate and then trying to claim SD is a no go. Its worthwhile to be able to let things slide off your shoulder and discuss after the fact. That's not to say dont be aware of your surroundings but just dont take flapping lips to heart too much.
Your opinion, facts or the truth aren't always worth getting involved in a situation.
I find it strange that people are ok with the "your store, your rules" when it comes to sagging pants, and yet, when the sign says "no firearms", they're quick to point out that unless it violates state law they're going to disregard the sign.
When my older son was in his teens, some of his friends started wearing saggy pants.Our local bank branch down the street has a standard sign at the door, same on all branches, that announces video surveillance and says no guns, no sunglasses, no hats, and no hoodies. Because the sign is legally correct and enforceable with regard to guns, and so as not to jeopardize my CCL, I honor the no guns part. The sunglasses and hats restriction I generally ignore. (I have not worn my only hoodie in over two years.) Sadly, as I have an old white-haired, white-guy appearance, they would not challenge me on the glasses or hat, but I would not be surprised if they routinely challenge under 30 year old men of dark complexion for the same "offense."
Like it or not, the reality is that the no hoodies and no saggy pants signs come across to many people as at least racially insensitive and often as downright racist. My opinion is that such signs are not a good idea.
P.S. the no guns sign thing is very state-law dependent. Back in Virginia, such a sign only meant that the proprietor could ask you to leave if discovering you were armed, and should you refuse to leave, make a civil complaint on trespassing. Here in Arkansas, the same sign is legally enforceable under criminal statute. And then, of course, is the wonderful Texas 30.06 (and 30.07) signage law.