Hawk
Member
I hadn't jumped in before but didn't realize the thread would have this long a set of legs. Personally, I believe Mas has the bona fides to get my full attention and respect. Should I decide to pin the grip safety of my 1911, stuff it full of handloads and put "Punisher" logo grips on and come to grief, it's my decision. Can't see arguing the point.
But, this notion that he's done a fine job of insulting net ninjas?
This is a piece I stashed away on the Etronix:
Sadly, I didn't keep the attribution (wasn't Mas). Neither is it my intention to drift the thread to electronic ignition. If one wants to be offended, I respectfully submit that Mas's comments were pretty gentle compared to what can be easily found.
Personally, I think his remarks were pretty accurate, too. Perhaps a little thicker skin might be in order?
But, this notion that he's done a fine job of insulting net ninjas?
This is a piece I stashed away on the Etronix:
A couple of years ago, curiosity got the better of me and I spent (read: wasted) an hour or two every day for a week scanning firearms chat rooms on the Internet. During that week I saw handloads recommended that would blow a cannon to smith-ereens, gunsmithing “tips” that would wreck an arsenal and assorted advice on firearms, scopes and ammunition that gave me the shivers.
All of this “advice” was contributed by self-styled experts cowering anonymously behind silly screen names; the anonymity, however, did nothing to conceal their ignorance. The one statement that stood above the rest for misguided stupidity was made by an individual who declared that he saw no reason to continue reading shooting magazines because he could learn all there was to know about guns and shooting right there in that chat room.
Had his face, rather than a phony screen name, been up there on my monitor, I might have tried to ram my fist through the glass and slap some sense into him, because that week, in the very chat room he was so highly praising, a remarkable new development in firearms design had just been thoroughly trashed.
The gun was Remington’s just announced Etronix rifle, and the dozens who condemned it had never shot one or seen one and hadn’t the vaguest notion of how one worked. Yet every criticism was applauded and cheered by onlookers in a mass pile-on, giving me a mental image of a cave full of primitive savages who have been shown a clock, with each trying to explain to the others what it is for and how it works and all of them finally beating it to death with their clubs. Only now the clubs were keyboards.
Sadly, I didn't keep the attribution (wasn't Mas). Neither is it my intention to drift the thread to electronic ignition. If one wants to be offended, I respectfully submit that Mas's comments were pretty gentle compared to what can be easily found.
Personally, I think his remarks were pretty accurate, too. Perhaps a little thicker skin might be in order?