Entertainment for the night...

Status
Not open for further replies.
FmrMarine

I understand your viewpoint, but I choose to stand up for my rights. I understand that many here think that's a very bad idea.

I'm rather ok with doing what I believe to be right even though others disagree. :)

(also, using "arsenal" in the improper sense is.... interesting to read from a THR member)
 
Blondes have more fun! I believe you know my daily rig - and why - and here's hoping you get a grin at memory! Two middle-aged lesbians truly armed to the teeth? They'd have to clear a desk. . .

And I wasn't even wearing a favorite broomstick skirt. . .

Take care out there.
 
I was using the word arsenal to articulate how the situation could be portrayed by defense counsel and the media.

I respect your decision to stand up for your rights and hope you don't think I intimated you were acting outside of those rights.

Regards,
Brian
 
Brian,

Not in the least did I understand your post as insinuation of my acting outside stated rights in both the BoR and CO law. You were simply telling me one possible outcome, one which I am very well aware of.

My first step is obtaining legal council and asking what they think. :)
 
PTK, seems to me as though they were catering towards the anti (assuming (s)he is one) Organizations often seem to think that most people are anti's, and structure themselves that way.

If he was 'wrong' in carrying three guns ('more than necessary'), you're wrong in getting a car with more than 4 cylinders, you could be using that extra power from a V8 to mow down many more people. Same general idea.

And, if it's a CCW, it's not a Concealed Carry In Everywhere except Wal-Mart license, it's a carry in every public place license!

Besides, what if he is invited to an impromptu plinking event, or he is in a shooting (alongside police), and they run out of shots/police weapon malfunctions (it could happen)
 
Here in CO, a CCW means I can OC or CC. :)

For some reason, the police forgot that.
 
PTK said:
My SO and I have trained so that if the SHTF, I grab the gun of my choice and she gets the other if she's close enough to get it before I'm moving for cover/concealment.
PTK said:
XD45, two extra mags, FN USG 5.7, two extra mags, NAA .22wmr revolver (and a knife and such). Same that I carry every day.
I like that! :D
I'm happy to see that you exercise your rights as much as you can. :)
 
At what point does preparedness cross that fine line over to fear and paranoia?

Just throwin that out there.---Krochus

Fear & Paranoia exist on no objective line. They are psychological terms, so in order to answer your question, we have to dissect and fracture a particular individual's PSYCHE.

Neither you, nor I, nor the police, nor store management, have medical or legal authority to do that.

It is however, the legal right of the individual to make such a decision according to their own (rather than societal) criteria.

/:uhoh:
 
Let's see here:

PTK is a good guy.

PTK likes guns, as do most of the people on THR.

PTK excersizes the right to carry guns and lots of them.

PTK is a good guy.

How do I know?

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Hmm....it doesn't say anything about how many guns you can carry, or how you dress, or what kind of shirt you have to wear. Yep, PTK was doing the right thing. :)

WalMart and the local PD need to be schooled on what our rights are. Don't be a coward, get out there and push back. :cool:
 
Re:

This site is about freedom, seems like a lot of us forget that from time to time.----Larry Ashcroft, Moderator





It is also about discussion. And if people want to say, "seems like your hardware exceeds your use," then that is also reasonable. "Freedom" has never meant "do what you want and I have no commentary on it." Why do people so often mistake discussion and disagreement as limiting freedom?---MJRW

Respectfully MJRW, your comment is only partly accurate.

That the site is about discussion, is obvious.

However, you make a secondary conclusion that does not follow from its premise. When you wrote:

if people want to say, "seems like your hardware exceeds your use," then that is also reasonable.----MJRW

But not without actual "reasons" objectively given it is not reasonable. Without objective reasons, it just becomes mere "opinion" which doesn't count much for objective knowledge.

Otherwise, we could identify objective criteria which dictates specific limitation on the number of guns carried.

The site, in that regard is about freedom, and we should carefully distinguish between reasons given for justification, versus mere opinion simply thrown out.

/:uhoh::uhoh::uhoh:
 
Sue the jerks. The won't stop trampling the rights of private citizens (who are "civilians" exactly the same as they are) until somebody makes them stop.

I am not sure that I see any RKBA issues here. The police officers did not arrest the OP, or confiscate his weapons.

What actually happened? Stripped of histrionics:

  1. Officers received a report of a man with a gun.
  2. The stopped the OP - who was far too manly to tell them he had a CCW license until late in the process - handcuffed him, and took temporary control of his weapons.
  3. One officer remarked that carrying that many weapons to Wal*Mart was abnormal.
  4. When the CCW was found to be legit, the OPs weapons were returned to him, and he went on his merry way.

I don't see any rights violations here at all. If the officers had beat him or taken his weapons, I could see that. If they had arrested him on a bogus charge, then he might have had a case.

The officer's remark was a absolutely true, and there's no sense from the story that it was anything more than a true remark.

Mike
 
I agree with RPCVYemen.


PTK - keep us posted on your legal action, it will be interesting to hear what an attorney has to say about this situation.
 
Stripped of histrionics

You mean, like the following tidbit from you? :rolleyes:


who was far too manly to tell them he had a CCW license until late in the process

Try getting surrounded by police (twelve. police. officers.) and doing/saying ANYTHING until they order so. It's difficult.

In any case, I'd say it was well under a minute after contact that I informed them of having a CCW for CO.
 
They never asked for a permit - they simply cuffed me and disarmed me. Not until AFTER my guns were off did I state that I had a permit ...

Also, I don't volunteer information to LEOs, no offense.

In any case, I'd say it was well under a minute after contact that I informed them of having a CCW for CO.

So you decided not to tell them initially that you had a CCW license - and now you're complaining because they assumed that you didn't have the CCW license you wouldn't tell them you had.

And they did something wrong in all this?

Seems like you can take one of two courses of action in this situation:

  1. Declare that you have a CCW, and reasonably expect that the officers expect that you have a CCW.
  2. Not declare that you have a CCW, and reasonably expect that the officers not expect that you have a CCW.

But what you want is:

  1. Not declare that you have a CCW, and reasonably ecpect the police officers to expect hyou have the a CCW.

You can either get the tough guy street cred of "Also, I don't volunteer information to LEOs, ..." or you can make as easy as possible for officer to do their work.

Mike
 
So you decided not to tell them initially that you had a CCW license - and now you're complaining because they assumed that you didn't have the CCW license you wouldn't tell them you had.

And they did something wrong in all this?

Seems like you can take one of two courses of action in this situation:

1. Declare that you have a CCW, and reasonably expect that the officers expect that you have a CCW.
2. Not declare that you have a CCW, and reasonably expect that the officers not expect that you have a CCW.


But what you want is:

1. Not declare that you have a CCW, and reasonably ecpect the police officers to expect hyou have the a CCW.


You can either get the tough guy street cred of "Also, I don't volunteer information to LEOs, ..." or you can make as easy as possible for officer to do their work.

Mike

Mike,

I'm glad you're perfect. Perhaps you could teach me.
 
PTK said:

Insinuations of my being paranoid/foolish/et cetera are not appreciated. It's not the thought that others find me foolish that is vexing, it's the disrespect shown to only beat around the bush. If you have something to say, by all means come out and say it - I won't be offended. I welcome all opinions, especially those that I don't agree with. I've had my eyes opened before.QUOTE]


I don't know that I made any reference to you being paranoid or foolish. I only quoted you. How you take your own quotes is your issue, not mine.

If it is "the thought that others find me foolish that is vexing", you always run the risk that any thread you start will be met with disagreement and discussion which I thought was the point of posting.

But OK. Fair enough. I will admit that the posts I have quoted stuck in my head as I was reading and made me wonder whether you are really concerned about your gun rights or just angry that the type of attention you received at Wal-Mart was not the type of attention you wanted. (Remember, you said you wouldn't be offended.)
 
Someone, and I wish I remembered who, said in another thread something about a given weapon being useful up to a certain percent of the time. A Kel-Tec P32 might be "enough gun" in 70% of situations, while a Sig 226 with three mags would suffice for 95% of possible scenarios, etc. The downside is that as you approach 100% (which I can only speculate involves a Bolo Mark XXXIV), the costs (financial, comfort, manuverability, concealability) increase significantly.

Which means that it's up to each one of us to decide what level of protection we're willing to accept based upon perceived potential threats. Most of us don't feel the need to layer our level IV plates to protect against multiple hits from .338 LM. I frequently carry a 5-shot .357, without a backup firearm or reloads, because I feel it meets my perceived needs. The day may come where I'm confronted with more than five attackers, but thus far it's not been a problem...and I'm not going to worry about it when there's so many better things to waste my worry on.

On the other hand, were I a beat cop in the hood, I wouldn't feel comfortable with any fewer than two handguns and a rifle. On a street corner in Iraq, I'd strongly prefer a Ma Deuce. The environment should ultimately be the primary factor.
 
When you notify WW that you aren't going back and why, make sure you tell them that this one WW store, security officer, told you not to enter any other WW in the world.

They will love that.

Pops

Wally world has a corporate policy that whatever is legal firearms related is legal in the store.


WHAT! You were carrying 3 guns lord knows how much ammo and you wonder why everyone flipped out.

I'm a hardcore gun nut and my first reaction to someone carrying that much heat with them would be that you were planing to go postal as well.

You need to learn to prioritize a bit better

He was carrying 105 rounds. Or 125 if his spare 5.7 mags were 30 rounders.
 
He was carrying 105 rounds. Or 125 if his spare 5.7 mags were 30 rounders.
Where is the problem? lol, I don't see any problem in someone carrying 3 guns and spare mags, he is prepared, maybe in a serious situation he would be the only one getting out of this on foot, and I respect that.
He is carrying enough so the person with him could defend herself with enough firepower too, so they would be 2 to get out on foot, and I truly respect that.
 
I'm just amazed he can keep his pants up with all that hardware on :neener::neener::neener:

Seriously, good for you, PTK. Two guns is one gun, one gun is no gun, is not just idle thought. Everybody on this board who owns ANY guns is considered "abnormal" by an awful lot of folks, and I doubt it keeps anyone up at night.

Keep us posted as to what the corporate office says, and what your attorney suggests.

Springmom
 
I've carried two 1911's before. Usually behind me, pistol grips reversed; and usually when on foot in big cities. One of them is a 6" long slide. No special belt or suspenders.

On Saturday I had them placed more traditionally, one on each side of my hip, for an open carry walk with others.

I usually reserve the New York reload for when I'm on foot in big cities a lot. Otherwise, one is more comfortable.
 
Where is the problem? lol, I don't see any problem in someone carrying 3 guns and spare mags, he is prepared, maybe in a serious situation he would be the only one getting out of this on foot, and I respect that.
He is carrying enough so the person with him could defend herself with enough firepower too, so they would be 2 to get out on foot, and I truly respect that.

I totally agree, the fact that his SO can't carry yet, but almost certainly goes to the range with him, means he could very well be carrying the XD for himself and the Five-seveN for her, with the NAA in case they run over a raccoon or something.
 
PTK, I'm not arguing with you, I'm not saying you did anything wrong. I'm not even casing around veiled accusations about your mental status as other have. I did ask why on earth you carried so heavy on a trip to wally world, which you answered and that answer seems to makes sense. I don't personally agree with that logic, but it's your life to live and your chiropractor bills for your back.

Surat, thank you very much for your rare (on THR at least) perspective of how the police mind works. It's making much more sense why the officers responded the way they did after reading your explanations.

NP. I'm trying. What a lot of people don't understand is that the entire world starts to look like perps when you are on the job. Separating the sheep from the goats is why we talk to people, ask hard questions, and check them NCIC etc etc. If people don't understand what I mean, then go for a ride along a couple times with your local agency Better yet, come to mine and ride with me. We have per capita rates that are nearly identical to New York City's.

I am arguing with the “the man is out to get us and cast us all into slave chains” faction along with the "cops are all bad, they just want my guns” faction. Attitudes of LEO's vary from place to place and laws differ from state to state. What a LEO says is not case law or statute. It's just his opinion. He is not a judge sitting on the bench. he is as someone else said, a guy with a badge who opened his mouth. If the officer in question made a bogus charge or false arrest this would be different. There was no rights violation on the OP. Period dot. It was an unfortunate circumstance brought on by a somewhat dimwit citizen who called in and, to my eyes, the lack of forthright communication on the part of the OP. Sorry PTK, if I was you "I'm packing and I've got a permit" would have been the first words out of my mouth. Too many cops have been shot by other cops on mistaken ID.

As for the statement of:
Unless they have reason to believe that a crime is being committed (and carrying a gun or three is not by its self a reason to suspect a crime is being committed) police should leave people alone. In some places it even works that way.

Great, I can see you have no clue how law enforcement operations work. Every single call is answered. BS or not. Telecommunicators cannot “10-22” (“disregard” around here) a call. They are in a building (sometimes a hundred) miles away. I answered a call the day before yesterday from a (personally) known paranoid schizophrenic who claimed people were breaking into her house. How can we be sure that there weren't people actually breaking in this time? Every 911 hang up, even when the TC can tell it's a fax machine. Every barking dog call. Woof Woof. It's not the job of the TC to investigate the call but the job of the officer. Maybe it works different in where you live but not at our department. All Suzie Scanner on asile 2 sees is “a man with a gun”. She doesn't know that robbers don't generally carry high dollar ordinance with nice holsters. She just sees a gun on a guy at Wal-mart at 2am.

Someone stated to the effect “All the officers had to do was ask for PTK to produce a permit and leave.”

OK, I tell you what, you volunteer to be the cop to ask that. Is he gonna pull out a permit or a .S&W .500 and blow your head off? How do you know this is a honest god fearing upright member of the community? Because he “looks ok”? Pray tell, answer that. If he pulls out a gun but I beat him on the draw, now I have to shoot him and I really don't wanna go through that.

How do I know that the permit he produces is still valid? Now I have the guy, who I know is armed but maybe his permit is revoked. . . now I have to effect and arrest of an armed subject.

Another aside. To most cops, except maybe newb rookies, criminals lie or evade, while honest people tell the truth. Simple fact. When you refuse to speak with an officer in a open forthright manner on the grounds that "his investigating is violating you god given rights", then you are acting like a suspect. If you get treated like a suspect, don't be surprised.

As for the inevitable wise elbow that crackd off "where are your papers" etc.,I hope that was a joke because you so don't wanna go there. Gotten so much as a cell phone contract without a social security number? Let me know how well you can write a check without your government issued ID (driver's licence). Ever had your print's taken for a job application or the like? Don't even get me started on AFIS. Been in the military and had your DNA collected (mouth swab)? Use a debit card? Gotten a passport?
 
Last edited:
Surat said:
Great, I can see you have no clue how law enforcement operations work. Every single call is answered. BS or not.

Okay, but I feel terrible for the taxpayers that are footing the bill for having an officer respond to a call where somebody says "I just took a huge dump. You gotta get an officer over to see this thing" or "I just saw a little girl eating a tootsie roll, that's gotta be bad for her teeth".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top