Malls debate how to protect shoppers from violence

Status
Not open for further replies.

NotPbFree

Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2007
Messages
34
Location
Corner of No and Where - Cheatham County, TN
Expert claims mall guards should be unarmed? :confused: Oh, yeah, it's a "gun free zone"!



Malls expected to assess security arrangements in wake of Wednesday shooting

Gunman at Omaha, Nebraska, mall killed 8 people and himself

Some security experts say such incidents are impossible to anticipate

Study by Police Foundation says training drills for mall guards are inadequate

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Some experts are skeptical that anything could have stopped Robert Hawkins from going on a murderous rampage at an Omaha, Nebraska, shopping mall on Wednesday.

"This is not something that anybody can reasonably anticipate," said Don Greene, a former FBI agent who has written a book on mall security.

"If the people closest to him didn't see any indicators or signs that he was going to go off so drastically ... how is some public safety officer supposed to recognize this person?" Greene asked.

In fact, security at Omaha's Westroads Mall did find Hawkins' behavior suspicious before the shooting, Omaha Police Chief Thomas Warren said Thursday.

Mall surveillance initially flagged Hawkins "based on his actions" when he entered the mall through the Von Maur store's main entrance on the second floor, Warren said. He said Hawkins exited quickly after entering, then re-entered within six minutes and appeared to be concealing something in a balled-up sweatshirt.

He then went up the elevator to the third floor, and when he got there, he immediately began firing, Warren said. "It doesn't appear as though there was an opportunity for intervention," he said.

Shopping malls around the country were expected to review their emergency plans and consider additional security measures in light of Wednesday's shooting, which killed eight.

"There is always a fear of copycats when something like this happens," said Malachy Kavanaugh, spokesman for the International Council of Shopping Centers. He said malls would be considering whether to close some entrances, bring in additional officers, and make security more visible.

There are 1,200 enclosed malls in the United States and about 50,000 shopping centers. Although some include police substations, most are patrolled by unarmed private mall and store security guards.

Should these private security guards be armed? "Absolutely not," said Greene. Greene said if a security officer were to pull a gun on an armed individual in a mall, it could result in "the gunfight at the 'OK corral,' and then we might have 23 people killed instead of eight."
"These random events are very challenging to prevent and difficult to deal with when they occur. Law enforcement and security prevention measures, no matter how good, cannot forestall a tragedy such as this from happening," said a statement issued Wednesday night by the Simon Property Group, which operates regional and outlet malls across the United States.

"We do not disclose or discuss our enhanced security measures and/or procedures that we have in place or may institute at any given time, some of which are visible to the public, with others intentionally less noticeable," the statement said. "Disclosure of such information could potentially compromise our efforts to provide a safe and secure environment."

Security expert Lou Palumbo told CNN one useful strategy was having trained law enforcement personnel watching people as they enter the mall.

"You start to observe the people coming into the mall area," he said. "To let them in your door and then try to figure out what they're doing, you know, it's not as effective as catching them as they're coming in the door."

The International Council of Shopping Centers has conducted focus groups with shoppers to test how they would react to even tighter "airport style" security measures, including bag checks and magnetometers.

According to Kavanaugh, the results have shown that shoppers would accept the measures only if the national threat advisory system was raised to its highest level, red. Such extreme measures are "in the mall industry playbook ... but it is something no one wants to do," said Kavanaugh.

While some mall owners have increased training of security personnel and have upgraded their emergency systems, many security experts believe more should and can be done. Those experts suggest it's a matter of money. They say until shoppers start staying away, mall owners will not make significant changes.

There are no national standards for security guards, and according to a 2006 study by the Police Foundation, only a few states require background checks, minimum hiring standards, or training.

The study also notes that drills to test security staffs' knowledge of what to do in an emergency, when done at all, "are seldom rigorous, seldom done with first responders, and are usually done without clear standards to measure their success." The report goes on to say that "many malls do not even have plans to limit access to sensitive areas in times of heightened alert."

Since that report was written, the International Council of Shopping Centers, in conjunction with George Washington University, has developed a DVD to train mall security guards. According to Kavanaugh, about 6,000 of the nation's estimated 20,000 mall security guards have participated in the course, including 10 at Westroads Mall, where Wednesday's shootings took place.

The FBI and other federal agencies have reached out to private security firms to share information on best practices. The FBI also sends out alerts regarding possible threats to the private sector -- but warnings of possible terrorist plans are clearly of no help in anticipating an attacker like Hawkins.

CNN's Jeanne Meserve, Eliott McLaughlin and Kelli Arena contributed to this report.
 
Should these private security guards be armed? "Absolutely not," said Greene. Greene said if a security officer were to pull a gun on an armed individual in a mall, it could result in "the gunfight at the 'OK corral,' and then we might have 23 people killed instead of eight."

Ahh, I see why Mr. Greene is a former FBI agent. Should the country follow Mr. Greene's stupendous logic I suppose its only a matter of time before the police are patrolling our streets with nothing more than a rape whistle and a stern glance. After all Mr. Greene's vast experience and knowledge proves that any sort of weapon in the hands of law enforcement will only triple the amount of violence carried out by criminals.
 
Well...For starters, they could take down the "Gun Free Zone" signs and allow law-abiding people to carry their defensive sidearms.

"It doesn't appear as though there was an opportunity for intervention," he said.

He's right. There wasn't time for an intervention based on his suspicious actions. The only thing that could have stopped him at the moment that he made that terrible decision to murder people at random would have been an armed citizen or plainclothes/off-duty cop who was on the scene when it started. One who was adept with his sidearm...willing to take immediate, decisive action to stop him. A uniformed police officer would have likely been his first target. Open carry does have its disadvantages.

I expect that there will be a few people who will take this as a wake-up call.
There are many who didn't need one, and understand full well that mall "security" is a joke. You're really no more secure there than you are on the street. So...More people will start to ignore the signs, and carry their pistols in defiance of the mall rules...and while I don't condone violating the law...I really can't say that I blame them. When the policies place me and mine in potentially deadly jeopardy...they can stick'em where the sun don't shine.

Greene said if a security officer were to pull a gun on an armed individual in a mall...yadda yadda yadda

When an individual has already hoisted the flag, an armed security guard shouldn't pull his gun unless he is planning on pulling the trigger. You don't challenge someone who is already in the process of killing people, and you're not required to...neither in a legal sense, nor in a moral one.

Like Tuco (wisely) said:

"When you have to shoot...shoot! Don't talk!"

And...as noted above...if the armed guard is obviously an armed guard...he'll probably be the first to be shot.
 
I expect that there will be a few people who will take this as a wake-up call.

Why in hell would I want to go near a shopping mall right now? Last time I went to a mall before Christmas, being shot was starting to sound better and better.
 
On-line shopping is the solution.

Or just go to BassPro or Cabela's. Note that people tend not to get shot there.
 
I shop online... not because I fear psychos in malls, but because I dont have to wade through 10,000 irate shoppers while being bombarded with annoying one-off versions of Christmas carols.
 
There is no solution. Random violence is one of the inherent risks of living in a (more or less) free society.
 
"If the people closest to him didn't see any indicators or signs that he was going to go off so drastically ... how is some public safety officer supposed to recognize this person?" Greene asked.

Ummm maybe he would be the guy carrying the rifle?.......
 
"the gunfight at the 'OK corral,' and then we might have 23 people killed instead of eight."

What kind of twisted universe does this fellow live in? He actually thinks it's SAFER to let the shooter do his thing until he gets tired of it! I'd suggest Greene is evil, but I suspect he may be mentally ill.

nothing more than a rape whistle and a stern glance

No no! Don't try to stop the rapist! That would just lead to more rapes. You are not QUALIFIED to stop the rapist.
 
Should these private security guards be armed? "Absolutely not," said Greene. Greene said if a security officer were to pull a gun on an armed individual in a mall, it could result in "the gunfight at the 'OK corral,' and then we might have 23 people killed instead of eight."
Translation: The CERTAINTY of being murdered by a crazed gunman is preferable to the POSSIBILITY of being wounded by the person who stops him.

Can anyone explain why the same "logic" doesn't apply to having armed police on the scene?

There's a certain class of cretin who prefers mass murder to self-defense, and he's obviously one of them.

I'll take the OK Corral to Babi Yar EVERY time.
 
Imagine how it feels to work in a mall for a company that also restricts the right to carry.


Not fun.
 
I can't even imagine. I'd sooner crawl down a bear trail at midnight unarmed than go into a mall unarmed. Those places are pits of crime. When I go into a mall, it's only for very quick trips and you can believe my hand is in my pocket on my Colt much of the time. Random nutters are the smallest problems. Gangs of teens roam the places looking for any excuse to get in a fight. It's no wonder so many of the big indoor malls are struggling now.
 
This type of thing is not new. Not even in the last century. All you can do is be perpared to put down the killer as soon as possible.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/run-amok.html

Run amok

Meaning

To 'run amok', which is sometimes spelled 'run amuck', is to behave in a wild or unruly manner.

Origin

'Run amok' is now synonymous with the term 'go crazy', but originally had a specific meaning. The term originated in Southeast Asia, where 'amok' (variously spelled amuk, amuck, amuco) meant 'a murderous frenzy or rage'. This derived from the state of mind of the Amuco - a class of 'death or glory' warriors who were employed in local power struggles in Java and Malaysia. Their belief was that fallen warriors became favourites of the gods, whereas failed missions were punished by dishonour and death. Unsurprisingly, the Amuco warriors had little to lose and their attacks were maniacal and frenzied. This is first alluded to in the 1516 text Barbosa, which was translated by Stanley, in 1866:

"There are some of them [the Javanese] who go out into the streets, and kill as many persons as they meet. These are called Amuco."

Captain James Cook, in his account of his travels in that part of the world - Voyages, 1772, gives an explicit definition of 'run amok':

"To run amock is to get drunk with opium... to sally forth from the house, kill the person or persons supposed to have injured the Amock, and any other person that attempts to impede his passage."
 
I shop online... not because I fear psychos in malls, but because I dont have to wade through 10,000 irate shoppers while being bombarded with annoying one-off versions of Christmas carols

Like I said, when I'm at a mall around Christmas, getting shot can sound pretty good.

I'd sooner crawl down a bear trail at midnight unarmed than go into a mall.

There. Fixed it.:D
 
These enclosed malls should have one security guard armed with a rifle fitted with a powerful scope. one shot one dead bad guy. I don't know many malls longer than a few hundred yards.

And YES to allowing patrons who have CCW to carry. Gun Free Zones are becomming nothing more than Free Kill Zones.
 
Should these private security guards be armed? "Absolutely not," said Greene.

:banghead: Yeah,because,gee whiz,what could a trained armed guard do in a situation like that?
 
1) shellshocked consumers burdened with high personal debt and energy prices

+

2) mob mentality of holiday shopping / bargain hunting

+

3) ordeal of trying to find a parking spot

+

4) general stress of the holidays

=

5) it's a wonder MORE people (besides young freaky white males) don't go postal at malls.
 
Maybe mall patrons should look out for their own safety. Maybe mall patrons should say 'to hell with the signs that say I have to be a sheep' and carry anyway.
 
The International Council of Shopping Centers has conducted focus groups with shoppers to test how they would react to even tighter "airport style" security measures, including bag checks and magnetometers.

I have a better solution: metal detectors, bag checks and strip searches outside everyone's front door. I mean, why let people loose without a good reason? Think of it - no long security lines. :D

If I'm cowering in a stockroom, I think I'll take the OK Corral over Fish in a Barrel, thanks.
 
The day indoor malls go to metal detectors and hand searches will be the "hell in a hand basket" moment for this country. Just, wow. The fact that people would be OK being searched to go pick up a pair of jeans is a sad commentary on our society. What is that quote about giving up liberty?
 
Possibly if there hadn't been no gun signs posted at all the entrances and the fact that mall security was unarmed, this incident might never have occured. At least not in that location.Fact is every similar incident since Columbine has happened in a gun free zone.Even crazies know to select a location that will allow them to "run amuck" at will.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top