PaladinX13
Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2002
- Messages
- 747
Your first point is irrelevant since I was talking about you using an MMA champion as an attempt to garner credibility. If it's true that street fights go to the ground, then let's talk about street fights instead of distracting us with notions of validity because of what a sport champion does. I'm making the scope more specific by even getting away from the street fight but thinking defense. Why is anyone taking me to the ground? A criminal- like a mugger or thief- no more wants to go there or be there than I. We've already taken bar fights and chest thumping out of the equation, so why exactly am I being taken down? So far the only example you've provided comes from testosterone, alcohol, and anger fueled fight. We should be better than that and able to side step conflicts like that.
That said, even if military training is best, I think it's a far cry from sport MMA except in the loosest sense. Using the word "MMA" like that is really no better than leaving the "mixed" off of it.
Joe will run when it suits him. Joe will draw and get the mugger to go away. Joe will shoot if he has to. Joe will fight if he has to. Notice these things dwindle in probability so Joe trained first and foremost to be conditioned so he wouldn't be a target, then trained to use his weapons because no one is going after him without an advantage (size, numbers, or weapons). Finally some time is spent on a highly specialized case.
Meanwhile, The Iceman is a champ with pride and anger issues. He doesn't run from slights and gets into unnecessary fights. No one's going to attack him unless they have a size, number, or weapon advantage at which point, they really do have the jump on Chuck.
I'm not telling you not to train in grappling. I'm not telling you it's useless. I AM saying that you do yourself or those you advise a disservice if you overstate the utility of training that is really very very specific for most people. Most people do not get into street fights. Most people don't have to physically man-handle other people whether in their occupation or day to day life. Most people don't have the time to train to a level sufficient to justify the cost (in defensive terms; certainly not enjoyment or conditioning or chest-beating confidence, apparently). The reason we believe in guns is because they're a great equalizer that makes even a 80lbs grandmother an equal or greater match for any Chuck Liddell... because we're intelligent tool users, not mindless brutes.
To sum up, talk about the subject as it relates to us, not people who's sport, occupation, or resources reflect a whole different world. Assess the reality of your situation to maximize the training you actually do instead of relying on statistics which are meaningless to your sample size of one.
btw, I'm not sure you could have picked a worse example! Chuck Liddell is an infamous striker, not grappler! But it goes further to prove the point that "MMA" isn't a style by far, it's really just talent athletes all doing what works best for them.
Can you give me a likelihood of getting into a street-fight that justifies the level of training required to excel at it? I'm not interested in street-fighting. I want to be able to defend myself. The fact that you mention the Army and Marine Corps just proves my point. They're NOT "most people" and don't deal with our day to day "most cases", they're a specialized group of individuals dealing with a specialized threat. Here again, is your attempt to glean authority from someone else. Talk about defense of you and I with regards to how much time we have and what threats we face, not compared to a MMA Champion with nothing but time and no threat or a solider with less time to train in H2H but a greater need than you or I. This is poor logic that dictates we all ought to use Government Issue firearms (and training) because US Soldiers do.Can you name a safe proving ground that's any closer to a one on one street fight? The Army and Marine Corps disagree with your notion because their current fighting styles pretty much mirror MMA.
That said, even if military training is best, I think it's a far cry from sport MMA except in the loosest sense. Using the word "MMA" like that is really no better than leaving the "mixed" off of it.
If "Joe Schmo" took a serious threat assessment at his lifestyle, risk profile, and resources available to spend on training, I'd absolutely pick "Joe Schmo" over the Iceman in not just a mugging but a multitude of defensive situations.That doesn't make their fighting style any less effective. They still possess their skills whether in ring or walking down the street. Or are you saying that Joe Schmo off the street has a better chance of fending off the typical mugger than Chuck Liddell & company?
Joe will run when it suits him. Joe will draw and get the mugger to go away. Joe will shoot if he has to. Joe will fight if he has to. Notice these things dwindle in probability so Joe trained first and foremost to be conditioned so he wouldn't be a target, then trained to use his weapons because no one is going after him without an advantage (size, numbers, or weapons). Finally some time is spent on a highly specialized case.
Meanwhile, The Iceman is a champ with pride and anger issues. He doesn't run from slights and gets into unnecessary fights. No one's going to attack him unless they have a size, number, or weapon advantage at which point, they really do have the jump on Chuck.
I'm not telling you not to train in grappling. I'm not telling you it's useless. I AM saying that you do yourself or those you advise a disservice if you overstate the utility of training that is really very very specific for most people. Most people do not get into street fights. Most people don't have to physically man-handle other people whether in their occupation or day to day life. Most people don't have the time to train to a level sufficient to justify the cost (in defensive terms; certainly not enjoyment or conditioning or chest-beating confidence, apparently). The reason we believe in guns is because they're a great equalizer that makes even a 80lbs grandmother an equal or greater match for any Chuck Liddell... because we're intelligent tool users, not mindless brutes.
To sum up, talk about the subject as it relates to us, not people who's sport, occupation, or resources reflect a whole different world. Assess the reality of your situation to maximize the training you actually do instead of relying on statistics which are meaningless to your sample size of one.
btw, I'm not sure you could have picked a worse example! Chuck Liddell is an infamous striker, not grappler! But it goes further to prove the point that "MMA" isn't a style by far, it's really just talent athletes all doing what works best for them.